Cited by 271Emergency and Acute Care StudiesHealthcare Policy and ManagementPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Insurance Status and Access to Urgent Ambulatory Care Follow-up Appointments

Asplin, Brent R.·2005·JAMA

Abstract

Context There is growing pressure to avoid hospitalizing emergency department patients who can be treated safely as outpatients, but this strategy depends on timely access to follow-up care. Objective To determine the association between reported insurance status and access to follow-up appointments for serious conditions that are commonly identified during an emergency department visit. Design, setting, and participants Eight research assistants called 499 randomly selected ambulatory clinics in 9 US cities (May 2002-February 2003) and identified themselves as new patients who had been seen in an emergency department and needed an urgent follow-up appointment (within 1 week) for 1 of 3 clinical vignettes (pneumonia, hypertension, or possible ectopic pregnancy). The same person called each clinic twice using the same clinical vignette but different insurance status. Main outcome measure Proportion of callers who were offered an appointment within a week. Results Of 499 clinics contacted in the final sample, 430 completed the study protocol. Four hundred six (47.2%) of 860 total callers and 277 (64.4%) of 430 privately insured callers were offered appointments within a week. Callers who claimed to have private insurance were more likely to receive appointments than those who claimed to have Medicaid coverage (63.6% [147/231] vs 34.2% [79/231]; difference, 29.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 21.2-37.6; P Conclusions Reported insurance status is associated with acce…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.294.10.1248

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Provider-related barriers to specialist care are potentially modifiable through health care policies, whereas patient-related or family-related barriers are less malleable to change.

    “In contrast to patient-related or family-related barriers, which are less malleable to change, providerrelated barriers are potentially modifiable through health care policies.16”
  • Without correcting provider acceptance of public insurance, disparities in access between public and private insurance are unlikely to be fully eliminated, even if all other barriers to access could be addressed.

    “Without correcting this dimension, it is unlikely that disparities in access between public and private insurance can be fully eliminated, even if all other barriers to access (e.g., out-of-pocket costs, referral requirement, and need for language proficiency, transportation, and health literacy) could be addressed.15,16”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 271

Authors
Asplin, B. R.
Affiliations
Regions Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Asplin, Brent R.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2005-09-14
Volume
294
Issue
10
Pages
1248
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2021737457
Cited by
271
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Chicago
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08-HS13007)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
insurance status, emergency department follow-up, Medicaid, uninsured patients, private insurance, appointment access, outpatients, health care costs, hypertension, ectopic pregnancy, patient satisfaction with care quality
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care Facilities, Appointments and Schedules, Continuity of Patient Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Insurance, Physician Services, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Time Factors, United States, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review