Cited by 600Ocular Infections and TreatmentsOcular Surface and Contact LensInfection Control in Healthcare

Multistate Outbreak of Fusarium Keratitis Associated With Use of a Contact Lens Solution

Chang, Douglas C., Grant, Gavin B., O’Donnell, Kerry, Wannemuehler, Kathleen A., Noble-Wang, Judith, Rao, Carol Y., Jacobson, Lara M., Crowell, Claudia S. +11 more·2006·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Fusarium keratitis is a serious corneal infection, most commonly associated with corneal injury. Beginning in March 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention received multiple reports of Fusarium keratitis among contact lens wearers. OBJECTIVE: To define the specific activities, contact lens hygiene practices, or products associated with this outbreak. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Epidemiological investigation of Fusarium keratitis occurring in the United States. A confirmed case was defined as keratitis with illness onset after June 1, 2005, with no history of recent ocular trauma and a corneal culture growing Fusarium species. Data were obtained by patient and ophthalmologist interviews for case patients and neighborhood-matched controls by trained personnel. Available Fusarium isolates from patients' clinical and environmental specimens were genotyped by multilocus sequence typing. Environmental sampling for Fusarium was conducted at a contact lens solution manufacturing plant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Keratitis infection with Fusarium species. RESULTS: As of June 30, 2006, we identified 164 confirmed case patients in 33 states and 1 US territory. Median age was 41 years (range, 12-83 years). Corneal transplantation was required or planned in 55 (34%). One hundred fifty-four (94%) of the confirmed case patients wore soft contact lenses. Forty-five case patients and 78 controls were included in the case-control study. Case patients were significantly more likely than controls to report using a specific contact lens solution, ReNu with MoistureLoc (69% vs 15%; odds ratio, 13.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-119.5). The prevalence of reported use of ReNu MultiPlus solution was similar between case patients and controls (18% vs 20%; odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.8). Fusarium was not recovered from the factory, warehouse, solution filtrate, or unopened solution bottles; production of implicated lots was not clustered in time. Among 39 isolates tested, at least 10 different Fusarium species were identified, comprising 19 unique multilocus genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this investigation indicate that this outbreak of Fusarium keratitis was associated with use of ReNu with MoistureLoc contact lens solution. Contact lens users should not use ReNu with MoistureLoc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.296.8.953

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Fusarium keratitis outbreak occurred in the United States as a result of a contact lens multipurpose solution lacking sufficient antifungal efficacy against Fusarium solani.

    “In fact, a Fusarium keratitis outbreak occurred in the United States as a result of a contact lens multipurpose solution lacking sufficient antifungal efficacy against F. solani (24, 105).”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [24]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 600

Authors
Chang, D. C., Grant, G. B., O’Donnell, K., Wannemuehler, K. A., Noble-Wang, J., Rao, C. Y., Jacobson, L. M., Crowell, C. S., Sneed, R. S., Lewis, F. M. T., Schaffzin, J. K., Kainer, M. A., Genese, C. A., Alfonso, E. C., Jones, D. B., Srinivasan, A., Fridkin, S. K., Park, B. J., & Fusarium Keratitis Investigation Team, F. T.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Dade County Medical Examiner Department (US)
  • Tennessee Department of Health (US)
  • New Jersey Department of Health (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2006-08-23
Volume
296
Issue
8
Pages
953
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2116582646
Cited by
600
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 33
FWCI
34.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
Fusarium keratitis, contact lens solutions, soft contact lenses, contact lens care, corneal infection, outbreak investigation, multilocus sequence typing, corneal transplantation, environmental sampling, product recall, contact lens safety, soft contact lens wearers, soft contact lens wear
MeSH terms
Adult, Disease Outbreaks, DNA, Fungal, Drug Packaging, Equipment Contamination, Female, Fusarium, Humans, Keratitis, Male, Middle Aged, Mycoses, United States, Case-Control Studies, Contact Lens Solutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review