The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Late vs Early Clamping of the Umbilical Cord in Full-term Neonates: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Controlled Trials
Abstract
CONTEXT: With few exceptions, the umbilical cord of every newborn is clamped and cut at birth, yet the optimal timing for this intervention remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the potential benefits and harms of late vs early cord clamping in term infants. DATA SOURCES: Search of 6 electronic databases (on November 15, 2006, starting from the beginning of each): the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Neonatal Group trials register, the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINHAL; hand search of secondary references in relevant studies; and contact of investigators about relevant published research. STUDY SELECTION: Controlled trials comparing late vs early cord clamping following birth in infants born at 37 or more weeks' gestation. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted data for outcomes of interest: infant hematologic status; iron status; and risk of adverse events such as jaundice, polycythemia, and respiratory distress. DATA SYNTHESIS: The meta-analysis included 15 controlled trials (1912 newborns). Late cord clamping was delayed for at least 2 minutes (n = 1001 newborns), while early clamping in most trials (n = 911 newborns) was performed immediately after birth. Benefits over ages 2 to 6 months associated with late cord clamping include improved hematologic status measured as hematocrit (weighted mean difference [WMD], 3.70%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.00%-5.40%); iron status as measured by ferritin concentration (WMD, 17.89; 95% CI, 16.58-19.21) and stored iron (WMD, 19.90; 95% CI, 7.67-32.13); and a clinically important reduction in the risk of anemia (relative risk (RR), 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40-0.70). Neonates with late clamping were at increased risk of experiencing asymptomatic polycythemia (7 studies [403 neonates]: RR, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.11-13.21; 2 high-quality studies only [281 infants]: RR, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.00-15.36). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying clamping of the umbilical cord in full-term neonates for a minimum of 2 minutes following birth is beneficial to the newborn, extending into infancy. Although there was an increase in polycythemia among infants in whom cord clamping was delayed, this condition appeared to be benign.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Cited by
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes
McDonald, S. J., Middleton, P., Dowswell, T., & Morris, P. S. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004074.pub3 · Cited by 890
Active Management of the Third Stage of Labour: Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage
Leduc, D., Senikas, V., Lalonde, A. B., Leduc, D., Ballerman, C., Biringer, A., Delaney, M., Duperron, L., Girard, I., Jones, D., et al. (2009) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34329-8 · Cited by 369
Guidelines on transfusion for fetuses, neonates and older children
New, H. V., Berryman, J., Bolton‐Maggs, P. H. B., Cantwell, C., Chalmers, E. A., Davies, T., Gottstein, R., Kelleher, A., Kumar, S., Morley, S. L., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.14233 · Cited by 359
Postpartum haemorrhage: prevention and treatment
Sentilhes, L., Merlot, B., Madar, H., Sztark, F., Brun, S., & Deneux-Tharaux, C. (2016) · Expert Review of Hematology · doi:10.1080/17474086.2016.1245135 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutton, E. K., & Hassan, E. S.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2007-03-21
- Volume
- 297
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1241
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2127499533
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Late vs Early Clamping of the Umbilical Cord in Full-term Neonates: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Controlled Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.297.11.1241
- The paper
- Hutton, E. K., & Hassan, E. S. (2007). Late vs Early Clamping of the Umbilical Cord in Full-term Neonates: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Controlled Trials. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.11.1241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.