Cited by 355Malaria Research and ControlHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Effect of Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Resistance on the Efficacy of Intermittent Preventive Therapy for Malaria Control During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

O. ter Kuile, Feiko, van Eijk, Annemieke M., Filler, Scott J.·2007·JAMA

Abstract

Context In malaria-endemic regions, strategies to control malaria during pregnancy rely on case management of malaria illness and anemia, and preventive measures such as insecticide-treated nets and intermittent preventive therapy (IPT). Objective To determine the effect of increasing resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on the efficacy of IPT during pregnancy in Africa. Data sources and study selection The 6 databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, LILACS, Cochrane CENTRAL, and the trial register and bibliographic database of the Malaria in Pregnancy Library were searched for relevant studies regardless of language, published between 1966 and December 2006. The reference lists of all trials identified were searched and researchers were contacted about relevant data. Nine trials of IPT with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine during pregnancy in Africa were identified and matched by year and location with treatment studies of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine among symptomatic children. Data extraction Data on the efficacy of IPT with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on placental and peripheral malaria, birth weight, and hemoglobin level/anemia were independently abstracted by 2 investigators. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance was defined as the proportion of total treatment failures in symptomatic children by day 14. Data synthesis Four trials compared 2-dose IPT with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to case management or placebo in women during their first or second pregnancy. The IPT reduced placental…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.297.23.2603

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review reported that IPTp with SP is effective up to a certain level of SP resistance.

    “This has been confirmed by a review reporting that IPTp with SP is effective up to a certain level of SP resistance.106”

    From Malaria in pregnancy. (2013) · cites this paper as [106]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 355

Authors
O. ter Kuile, F., van Eijk, A. M., & Filler, S. J.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2007-06-20
Volume
297
Issue
23
Pages
2603
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2102280420
Cited by
355
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 25
FWCI
29.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance, malaria in pregnancy, antimalarial drug resistance, placental malaria, low birth weight, anemia in pregnancy, insecticide-treated nets, HIV-positive pregnant women
MeSH terms
Antimalarials, Drug Combinations, Drug Resistance, Female, Humans, Malaria, Pregnancy, Pyrimethamine, Sulfadoxine, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review