Meeting the Survival Needs of the World's Least Healthy People: A Proposed Model for Global Health Governance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since 2004, there has been a significant increase in the number of states that have legislated for national mandatory seatbelt use.
“Since then, there has been a significant increase in the number of states that have legislated for national mandatory seatbelt use.270”
From The legal determinants of health: harnessing the power of law for global health and sustainable development (2019) · cites this paper as [270]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Gostin, L. O.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gostin, Lawrence O.
- ORCID
- Gostin, Lawrence O.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2007-07-11
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2051591512
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 15.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Keywords
- survival needs, health disparities, poverty, basic needs, global health
- MeSH terms
- Health Services Needs and Demand, International Cooperation, Mortality, Global Health, Models, Organizational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
