The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcomes in Adults With Bicuspid Aortic Valves
Abstract
CONTEXT: Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital cardiac anomaly in the adult population. Cardiac outcomes in a contemporary population of adults with bicuspid aortic valve have not been systematically determined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and predictors of cardiac outcomes in a large consecutive series of adults with bicuspid aortic valve. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study examining cardiac outcomes in 642 consecutive ambulatory adults (mean [SD] age, 35 [16] years; 68% male) with bicuspid aortic valve presenting to a Canadian congenital cardiac center from 1994 through 2001 and followed up for a mean (SD) period of 9 (5) years. Frequency and predictors of major cardiac events were determined by multivariate analysis. Mortality rate in the study group was compared with age- and sex-matched population estimates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and cause of death were determined. Primary cardiac events were defined as the occurrence of any of the following complications: cardiac death, intervention on the aortic valve or ascending aorta, aortic dissection or aneurysm, or congestive heart failure requiring hospital admission during the follow-up period. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, there were 28 deaths (mean [SD], 4% [1%]). One or more primary cardiac events occurred in 161 patients (mean [SD], 25% [2%]), which included cardiac death in 17 patients (mean [SD], 3% [1%]), intervention on aortic valve or ascending aorta in 142 patients (mean [SD], 22% [2%]), aortic dissection or aneurysm in 11 patients (mean [SD], 2% [1%]), or congestive heart failure requiring hospital admission in 16 patients (mean [SD], 2% [1%]). Independent predictors of primary cardiac events were age older than 30 years (hazard ratio [HR], 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.15-4.19; P<.001), moderate or severe aortic stenosis (HR, 5.67; 95% CI, 4.16-7.80; P<.001), and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.93-3.76; P<.001). The 10-year survival rate of the study group (mean [SD], 96% [1%]) was not significantly different from population estimates (mean [SD], 97% [1%]; P = .71). At last follow-up, 280 patients (mean [SD], 45% [2%]) had dilated aortic sinus and/or ascending aorta. CONCLUSIONS: In this study population of young adults with bicuspid aortic valve, age, severity of aortic stenosis, and severity of aortic regurgitation were independently associated with primary cardiac events. Over the mean follow-up duration of 9 years, survival rates were not lower than for the general population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lang, R. M., Bierig, M., Devereux, R. B., Flachskampf, F. A., Foster, E., Pellikka, P. A., Picard, M. H., Roman, M. J., Seward, J., Shanewise, J. S., et al. (2005) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005 · Cited by 11,318
Otto, C. M., Burwash, I. G., Legget, M. E., Munt, B. I., Fujioka, M., Healy, N. L., Kraft, C. D., Miyake-Hull, C. Y., & Schwaegler, R. G. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.95.9.2262 · Cited by 1,146
Roberts, W. C., & Ko, J. M. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000155623.48408.c5 · Cited by 1,000
Cited by
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease
Vahanian, A., Beyersdorf, F., Praz, F., Milojevic, M., Baldus, S., Bauersachs, J., Capodanno, D., Conradi, L., De Bonis, M., De Paulis, R., et al. (2022) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395 · Cited by 5,685
Erbel (2014) · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 · Cited by 4,451
Otto, C. M., Nishimura, R. A., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., Gentile, F., Jneid, H., Krieger, E. V., Mack, M., McLeod, C., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000923 · Cited by 3,686
Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012)
Authors/Task Force Members, Vahanian, A., Alfieri, O., Andreotti, F., Antunes, M. J., Barón-Esquivias, G., Baumgartner, H., Borger, M. A., Carrel, T. P., De Bonis, M., et al. (2012) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109 · Cited by 3,559
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease
Nishimura, R. A., Otto, C. M., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., Guyton, R. A., O’Gara, P. T., Ruiz, C. E., Skubas, N. J., Sorajja, P., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536 · Cited by 3,523
Metadata
- Authors
- Tzemos, N.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2008-09-17
- Volume
- 300
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1317
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2107730622
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes in Adults With Bicuspid Aortic Valves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.300.11.1317
- The paper
- Tzemos, N. (2008). Outcomes in Adults With Bicuspid Aortic Valves. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.11.1317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.