The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults—United States, 2010
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Binge drinking accounts for more than half of the estimated 80,000 average annual deaths and three quarters of $223.5 billion in economic costs resulting from excessive alcohol consumption in the United States. METHODS: CDC analyzed data collected in 2010 on the prevalence of binge drinking (defined as four or more drinks for women and five or more drinks for men on an occasion during the past 30 days) among U.S. adults aged ≥18 years in 48 states and the District of Columbia; and on the frequency (average number of episodes per month) and intensity (average largest number of drinks consumed on occasion) among binge drinkers. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of binge drinking was 17.1%. Among binge drinkers, the frequency of binge drinking was 4.4 episodes per month, and the intensity was 7.9 drinks on occasion. Binge drinking prevalence (28.2%) and intensity (9.3 drinks) were highest among persons aged 18-24 years. Frequency was highest among binge drinkers aged ≥65 years (5.5 episodes per month). Respondents with household incomes ≥$75,000 had the highest binge drinking prevalence (20.2%), but those with household incomes <$25,000 had the highest frequency (5.0 episodes per month) and intensity (8.5 drinks on occasion). The age-adjusted prevalence of binge drinking in states ranged from 10.9% to 25.6%, and the age-adjusted intensity ranged from 6.0 to 9.0 drinks on occasion. CONCLUSIONS: Binge drinking is reported by one in six U.S. adults, and those who binge drink tend to do so frequently and with high intensity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE: More widespread implementation of Community Guide-recommended interventions (e.g., measures controlling access to alcohol and increasing prices) could reduce the frequency, intensity, and ultimately the prevalence of binge drinking, as well as the health and social costs related to it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Roerecke, M., & Rehm, J. (2014) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0182-6 · Cited by 342
Pickens, C. M., Pierannunzi, C., Garvin, W., & Town, M. (2018) · MMWR. Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6709a1 · Cited by 332
Prevalence of Alcohol Dependence Among US Adult Drinkers, 2009–2011
Esser, M. B., Hedden, S. L., Kanny, D., Brewer, R. D., Gfroerer, J. C., & Naimi, T. S. (2014) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd11.140329 · Cited by 263
Han, B. H., Moore, A. A., Sherman, S., Keyes, K. M., & Palamar, J. J. (2017) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.003 · Cited by 260
Drinking Beyond the Binge Threshold: Predictors, Consequences, and Changes in the U.S.
Hingson, R. W., Zha, W., & White, A. M. (2017) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.014 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2012-03-07
- Volume
- 307
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 908
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4299700067
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults—United States, 2010. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.307.9.908
- The paper
- Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults—United States, 2010. (2012). JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.307.9.908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.