Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differences in the Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Typical and Atypical Takotsubo Syndrome: Data From the International Takotsubo Registry

Open access
Ghadri, Jelena R., Cammann, Victoria L., Napp, L. Christian, Jurisic, Stjepan, Diekmann, Johanna, Bataiosu, Dana Roxana, Seifert, Burkhardt, Jaguszewski, Milosz, Sarcon, Annahita, Neumann, Catharina A., Geyer, Verena, Prasad, Abhiram, Bax, Jeroen J., Ruschitzka, Frank, Lüscher, Thomas F., Templin, Christian, for the International Takotsubo (InterTAK) Registry·2016·JAMA Cardiology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Apical ballooning is broadly recognized as the classic form of takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Atypical subtypes of TTS also exist, which constitute about 20% of all cases. To date, clinical profile and course of atypical TTS types have rarely been studied. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical profile and outcomes of typical vs atypical types of TTS in a large patient cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Records of 1750 patients from the International Takotsubo Registry, comprising 26 participating cardiovascular centers in 9 different countries, were reviewed and data on clinical profile and outcomes collected from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical characteristics and in-hospital as well as long-term outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1750 patients diagnosed with TTS between 1998 and 2014, a total of 1430 (81.7%) presented with apical TTS (defined as typical TTS) and 320 (18.3%) with midventricular, basal, or focal TTS (all defined as atypical TTS). Patients with atypical TTS were younger than those with typical TTS (mean [SD], 62.5 [13.3] vs 67.3 [12.9] years; P < .001). Brain natriuretic peptide levels on admission were lower (median factor increase of the upper limit of normal, 4.18 vs 6.59; P = .02) and left ventricular ejection fraction was higher (mean [SD], 43.4% [10.7%] vs 40.6% [12.0%]; P < .001) in patients with atypical than those with typical forms of TTS. ST-segment depression was more prevalent in patients with atypical TTS (31 of 286 [10.8%] vs 90 of 1292 [7.0%]; P = .03), while ST-segment elevation was found more frequently in patients with typical TTS (593 of 1292 [45.9%] vs 97 of 286 [33.9%]; P < .001). Patients with atypical TTS more often had neurologic disorders than those with typical TTS (81 of 274 [29.6%] vs 286 of 1251 [22.9%]; P = .02). While in-hospital mortality was comparable between patients with atypical and typical TTS (10 of 320 [3.1%] vs 62 of 1430 [4.3%]; P = .32), the atypical forms showed a favorable outcome at 1 year (P = .01). However, after adjustment for confounders, only left ventricular ejection fraction less than 45%, atrial fibrillation, and neurologic disease, but not the type of TTS, were independent predictors. After 1 year, patients with both types of TTS showed a similar prognosis at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Atypical TTS has different characteristics than typical TTS, including younger age of onset, more frequent ST-segment depression, higher prevalence of neurologic diseases, less pronounced reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction, and lower brain natriuretic peptide values on admission. Outcomes are comparable between patients with both types after adjustment for confounders, suggesting that both should be equally monitored.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0225

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Metadata

Authors
Ghadri, J. R., Cammann, V. L., Napp, L. C., Jurisic, S., Diekmann, J., Bataiosu, D. R., Seifert, B., Jaguszewski, M., Sarcon, A., Neumann, C. A., Geyer, V., Prasad, A., Bax, J. J., Ruschitzka, F., Lüscher, T. F., Templin, C., & for the International Takotsubo (InterTAK) Registry
Venue
JAMA Cardiology
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
335
ISSN
2380-6583 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2338153572
Cited by
258
References
4
FWCI
18.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in the Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Typical and Atypical Takotsubo Syndrome: Data From the International Takotsubo Registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0225
The paper
Ghadri, J. R., Cammann, V. L., Napp, L. C., Jurisic, S., Diekmann, J., Bataiosu, D. R., Seifert, B., Jaguszewski, M., Sarcon, A., Neumann, C. A., Geyer, V., Prasad, A., Bax, J. J., Ruschitzka, F., Lüscher, T. F., Templin, C., & for the International Takotsubo (InterTAK) Registry. (2016). Differences in the Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Typical and Atypical Takotsubo Syndrome: Data From the International Takotsubo Registry. JAMA Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0225

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.