Cited by 122Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionMedication Adherence and Compliance

Association of Patient Perceptions of Cardiovascular Risk and Beliefs on Statin Drugs With Racial Differences in Statin Use: Insights From the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management Registry

Open access
Nanna, Michael G., Navar, Ann Marie, Zakroysky, Pearl, Xiang, Qun, Goldberg, Anne C., Robinson, Jennifer, Roger, Veronique L., Virani, Salim S. +5 more·2018·JAMA Cardiology

Abstract

Importance: African American individuals face higher atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk than white individuals; reasons for these differences, including potential differences in patient beliefs regarding preventive care, remain unknown. Objective: To evaluate differences in statin use between white and African American patients and identify the potential causes for any observed differences. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using the 2015 Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) Registry data, we compared statin use and dosing between African American and white outpatient adults who were potentially eligible for primary or secondary prevention statins. A total of 138 US community health care practices contributed to the data. Data analysis was conducted from March 2017 to May 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were use and dosing of statin therapy according to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline by African American or white race. Secondary outcomes included lipid levels and patient-reported beliefs. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association between race and statin undertreatment, a category combining people who were not taking a statin or those taking a dose intensity lower than recommended. Results: A total of 5689 patients (806 [14.2%] African American) in the PALM registry were eligible for statin therapy. African American individuals were less likely than white individuals to be treated with a statin (570/807 [70.6%] vs 3654/4883 [74.8%]; P = .02). Among those treated, African American patients were less likely than white patients to receive a statin at guideline-recommended intensity (269 [33.3%] vs 2145 [43.9%], respectively; P < .001; relative risk, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.00-1.15]; P = .05, after adjustment for demographic and clinical factors). The median (interquartile range) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of patients receiving treatment were higher among African American than white individuals (97.0 [76.0-121.0] mg/dL vs 85.0 [68.0-105.0] mg/dL; P < .001). African American individuals were less likely than white individuals to believe statins were safe (292 [36.2%] vs 2800 [57.3%]; P < .001) or effective (564 [70.0%] vs 3635 [74.4%]; P = .008) and were less likely to trust their clinician (663 [82.3%] vs 4579 [93.8%]; P < .001). Group differences in statin undertreatment were not significant after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and clinician factors, socioeconomic status, and patient beliefs (final adjusted relative risk, 1.03 [95% CI 0.96-1.11]; P = .35). Conclusions and Relevance: African American individuals were less likely to receive guideline-recommended statin therapy. Demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, belief-related, and clinician differences contributed to observed differences and represent potential targets for intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1511

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Black Americans and Hispanic Americans are less likely than NHW to be initiated on statin therapy or achieve LDL goals.

    “However, Black Americans and Hispanic Americans are less likely than NHW to be initiated on statin therapy or achieve LDL (low-density lipoprotein) goals.37,38”

    From Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Peripheral Artery Disease (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports lower statin use and higher LDL-C levels among African American than Caucasian patients. The Methods section (page unavailable) says some Caucasian participants identified as Hispanic, so the comparator was not specifically non-Hispanic White patients. The paper does not report a separate Hispanic comparison, statin initiation rates, or LDL-goal achievement. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 122

Authors
Nanna, M. G., Navar, A. M., Zakroysky, P., Xiang, Q., Goldberg, A. C., Robinson, J., Roger, V. L., Virani, S. S., Wilson, P. W. F., Elassal, J., Lee, L. V., Wang, T. Y., & Peterson, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
  • Duke University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • Regeneron (United States) (US)
  • Sanofi (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Nanna, Michael G.
Venue
JAMA Cardiology
Published
2018-08-01
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
739
ISSN
2380-6583 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807844095
Cited by
122
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • American Heart Association
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • Amarin Corporation
  • Esperion Therapeutics
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K01HL133416)
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
statin therapy, racial disparities, African American patients, cardiovascular risk perception, lipid control, LDL cholesterol, primary and secondary prevention, guideline-directed therapy, health literacy
MeSH terms
Aged, Attitude to Health, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Primary Prevention, Registries, Risk, Social Class, United States, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Guideline Adherence, White People, Atherosclerosis, Healthcare Disparities, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review