Cited by 9Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDigital Imaging in MedicineCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diagnosing With a Camera From a Distance—Proceed Cautiously and Responsibly

Turakhia, Mintu P.·2020·JAMA Cardiology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4572

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yan, High-throughput, contact-free detection of atrial fibrillation from video with deep learning, JAMA Cardiol

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Turakhia, M. P.
Affiliations
VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Turakhia, Mintu P.
Venue
JAMA Cardiology
Published
2020-01-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
107
ISSN
2380-6583 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2989625014
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 6 · 2020: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Imaging in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
remote diagnosis, telemedicine, physician responsibility
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Atrial Fibrillation, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review