Cited by 108Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Results of a remotely delivered hypertension and lipid program in more than 10?000 patients across a diverse health care network.

Open access
Blood, Alexander J., Cannon, Christopher P., Gordon, William J., Mailly, Charlotte, MacLean, Taylor, Subramaniam, Samantha, Tucci, Michela, Crossen, Jennifer +13 more·2023·JAMA Cardiology

Abstract

Importance: Blood pressure (BP) and cholesterol control remain challenging. Remote care can deliver more effective care outside of traditional clinician-patient settings but scaling and ensuring access to care among diverse populations remains elusive. Objective: To implement and evaluate a remote hypertension and cholesterol management program across a diverse health care network. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between January 2018 and July 2021, 20 454 patients in a large integrated health network were screened; 18 444 were approached, and 10 803 were enrolled in a comprehensive remote hypertension and cholesterol program (3658 patients with hypertension, 8103 patients with cholesterol, and 958 patients with both). A total of 1266 patients requested education only without medication titration. Enrolled patients received education, home BP device integration, and medication titration. Nonlicensed navigators and pharmacists, supported by cardiovascular clinicians, coordinated care using standardized algorithms, task management and automation software, and omnichannel communication. BP and laboratory test results were actively monitored. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in BP and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Results: The mean (SD) age among 10 803 patients was 65 (11.4) years; 6009 participants (56%) were female; 1321 (12%) identified as Black, 1190 (11%) as Hispanic, 7758 (72%) as White, and 1727 (16%) as another or multiple races (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, unknown, other, and declined to respond; consolidated owing to small numbers); and 142 (11%) reported a preferred language other than English. A total of 424 482 BP readings and 139 263 laboratory reports were collected. In the hypertension program, the mean (SD) office BP prior to enrollment was 150/83 (18/10) mm Hg, and the mean (SD) home BP was 145/83 (20/12) mm Hg. For those engaged in remote medication management, the mean (SD) clinic BP 6 and 12 months after enrollment decreased by 8.7/3.8 (21.4/12.4) and 9.7/5.2 (22.2/12.6) mm Hg, respectively. In the education-only cohort, BP changed by a mean (SD) −1.5/−0.7 (23.0/11.1) and by +0.2/−1.9 (30.3/11.2) mm Hg, respectively ( P < .001 for between cohort difference). In the lipids program, patients in remote medication management experienced a reduction in LDL-C by a mean (SD) 35.4 (43.1) and 37.5 (43.9) mg/dL at 6 and 12 months, respectively, while the education-only cohort experienced a mean (SD) reduction in LDL-C of 9.3 (34.3) and 10.2 (35.5) mg/dL at 6 and 12 months, respectively ( P < .001). Similar rates of enrollment and reductions in BP and lipids were observed across different racial, ethnic, and primary language groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study indicate that a standardized remote BP and cholesterol management program may help optimize guideline-directed therapy at scale, reduce cardiovascular risk, and minimize the need for in-person visits among diverse populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is growing evidence that team management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, delivered remotely, is effective and provides outcomes comparable with in-person encounters.

    “there is growing evidence that team management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, delivered remotely, is effective and provides outcomes comparable with in-person encounters.24,54”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 108

Authors
Blood, A. J., Cannon, C. P., Gordon, W. J., Mailly, C., MacLean, T., Subramaniam, S., Tucci, M., Crossen, J., Nichols, H., Wagholikar, K. B., Zelle, D., McPartlin, M., Matta, L. S., Oates, M., Aronson, S., Murphy, S., Landman, A., Fisher, N. D. L., Gaziano, T. A., Plutzky, J., & Scirica, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Mass General Brigham (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
JAMA Cardiology
Published
2023-01-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
12
ISSN
2380-6583 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308636366
Cited by
108
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 3
FWCI
19.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL151643)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
hypertension, cholesterol management, remote patient monitoring, home blood pressure monitoring, dose titration, LDL cholesterol, telemedicine, integrated health care networks, racial and ethnic diversity, health equity, medication adherence, patient engagement, chronic disease management
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Cholesterol, LDL, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review