Cited by 3Cultural Competency in Health CareDiversity and Career in MedicineDermatology and Skin Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spectrum of Diversity in Dermatology: The Need to Broaden Clinical Trial Participants in Our Increasingly Multiethnic and Multicultural Society

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4130

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Desai, S. R., Hernandez, C., & McMichael, A. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
Venue
JAMA Dermatology
Published
2017-02-01
Volume
153
Issue
2
Pages
132
ISSN
2168-6068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2569391666
Cited by
3
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
diversity, dermatology workforce, health equity, underrepresented minorities in medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review