The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Biologics and Oral Treatments for Plaque Psoriasis: A Meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Importance: The clinical benefits of novel treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis are well established, but wide variations exist in patient response across different therapies. In the absence of head-to-head randomized trials, meta-analyses synthesizing data from multiple studies are needed to assess comparative efficacy among psoriasis treatments. Objective: To estimate the relative short-term and long-term efficacy of biologics and oral agents for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Data Sources: A systematic literature review was conducted on December 4, 2017, and updated on September 17, 2018. The Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register databases were included. Study Selection: Phase 2, 3, or 4 randomized clinical trials of treatments licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for adults with moderate to severe psoriasis with data on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index assessment of 75%, 90%, and 100% reductions (PASI 75, 90, and 100) at 10 to 16 weeks (short-term efficacy) or 44 to 60 weeks (long-term efficacy) from baseline. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. A bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate short-term PASI response rates; to account for variation across trials, an ordinal model that adjusted for reference arm response was implemented. The long-term PASI rates were estimated via a traditional meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: PASI 75, 90, and 100 response rates at 10 to 16 weeks and 44 to 60 weeks from baseline. Results: Sixty trials meeting all inclusion criteria were included. At weeks 10 to 16, the highest PASI 90 rates were seen with risankizumab-rzaa (71.6%; 95% credible interval [CrI], 67.5%-75.4%), brodalumab (70.8%; 95% CrI, 66.8%-74.6%), ixekizumab (70.6%; 95% CrI, 66.8%-74.6%), and guselkumab (67.3%; 62.5%-71.9%). At weeks 44 to 60, the treatments with the highest PASI 90 rates were risankizumab-rzaa (79.4%, 95% CI, 75.5%-82.9%), guselkumab (76.5%; 95% CI, 72.1%-80.5%), brodalumab (74.0%; 95% CI, 69.3%-78.1%), and ixekizumab (73.9%; 95% CI, 69.9%-77.5%). Findings were consistent for short-term and long-term PASI 75 and 100 responses. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides an assessment of the comparative efficacy among treatments for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The meta-analysis suggests that brodalumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, and risankizumab-rzaa were associated with the highest PASI response rates in both short-term and long-term therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Hutton, B., Salanti, G., Caldwell, D. M., Chaimani, A., Schmid, C. H., Cameron, C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Straus, S., Thorlund, K., Jansen, J. P., et al. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-2385 · Cited by 8,269
Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis—results of two phase 3 trials
Langley, R. G., Elewski, B. E., Lebwohl, M., Reich, K., Griffiths, C. E. M., Papp, K., Puig, L., Nakagawa, H., Spelman, L., Sigurgeirsson, B., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1314258 · Cited by 1,997
Leonardi, C. L., Kimball, A. B., Papp, K. A., Yeilding, N., Guzzo, C., Wang, Y., Li, S., Dooley, L. T., & Gordon, K. B. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60725-4 · Cited by 1,874
Papp, K. A., Langley, R. G., Lebwohl, M., Krueger, G. G., Szapary, P., Yeilding, N., Guzzo, C., Hsu, M.-C., Wang, Y., Li, S., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60726-6 · Cited by 1,361
Dias, S., Sutton, A. J., Ades, A. E., & Welton, N. J. (2013) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x12458724 · Cited by 1,207
Etanercept as Monotherapy in Patients with Psoriasis
Leonardi, C. L., Powers, J. L., Matheson, R. T., Goffe, B. S., Zitnik, R., Wang, A., & Gottlieb, A. B. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030409 · Cited by 1,175
Reich, K., Nestle, F. O., Papp, K., Ortonne, J.-P., Evans, R., Guzzo, C., Li, S., Dooley, L. T., & Griffiths, C. E. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67566-6 · Cited by 1,045
Brodalumab, an Anti–Interleukin-17–Receptor Antibody for Psoriasis
Papp, K. A., Leonardi, C., Menter, A., Ortonne, J.-P., Krueger, J. G., Kricorian, G., Aras, G., Li, J., Russell, C. B., Thompson, E. H. Z., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1109017 · Cited by 941
Self-citationBlauvelt, A., Papp, K. A., Griffiths, C. E. M., Randazzo, B., Wasfi, Y., Shen, Y.-K., Li, S., & Kimball, A. B. (2017) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.041 · Cited by 897
Cited by
Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment of Psoriasis: A Review
Armstrong, A. W., & Read, C. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4006 · Cited by 2,335
Self-citationTherapeutics targeting the IL-23 and IL-17 pathway in psoriasis
Ghoreschi, K., Balato, A., Enerbäck, C., & Sabat, R. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00184-7 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Armstrong, A. W., Puig, L., Joshi, A., Skup, M., Williams, D., Li, J., Betts, K. A., & Augustin, M.
- Venue
- JAMA Dermatology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2020-03-01
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 258
- ISSN
- 2168-6068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3005392748
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 11.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Biologics and Oral Treatments for Plaque Psoriasis: A Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4029
- The paper
- Armstrong, A. W., Puig, L., Joshi, A., Skup, M., Williams, D., Li, J., Betts, K. A., & Augustin, M. (2020). Comparison of Biologics and Oral Treatments for Plaque Psoriasis: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.