Association of Spironolactone Use With Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Importance: While originally approved for the management of heart failure, hypertension, and edema, spironolactone is commonly used off label in the management of acne, hidradenitis, androgenetic alopecia, and hirsutism. However, spironolactone carries an official warning from the US Food and Drug Administration regarding potential for tumorigenicity. Objective: To determine the pooled occurrence of cancers, in particular breast and prostate cancers, among those who were ever treated with spironolactone. Data Sources: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception through June 11, 2021. The search was restricted to studies in the English language. Study Selection: Included studies reported the occurrence of cancers in men and women 18 years and older who were exposed to spironolactone. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two independent reviewers (K.B. and H.H.) selected studies, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Studies were synthesized using random effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cancer occurrence, with a focus on breast and prostate cancers. Results: Seven studies met eligibility criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 18 035 to 2.3 million and a total population of 4 528 332 individuals (mean age, 62.6-72.0 years; in the studies without stratification by sex, women accounted for 17.2%-54.4%). All studies were considered to be of low risk of bias. No statistically significant association was observed between spironolactone use and risk of breast cancer (risk ratio [RR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86-1.22; certainty of evidence very low). There was an association between spironolactone use and decreased risk of prostate cancer (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90; certainty of evidence very low). There was no statistically significant association between spironolactone use and risk of ovarian cancer (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.84-2.20; certainty of evidence very low), bladder cancer (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.07; certainty of evidence very low), kidney cancer (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.85-1.07; certainty of evidence low), gastric cancer (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.80-1.24; certainty of evidence low), or esophageal cancer (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.27; certainty of evidence low). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, spironolactone use was not associated with a substantial increased risk of cancer and was associated with a decreased risk of prostate cancer. However, the certainty of the evidence was low and future studies are needed, including among diverse populations such as younger individuals and those with acne or hirsutism.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A systematic review of seven studies of 4.5 million individuals found no statistically significant association between spironolactone use in men and women over age 18 and risks of breast, ovarian, bladder, kidney, gastric, or esophageal cancer, based on low to very low certainty evidence.
“A systematic review of 7 studies of 4.5 million individuals showed no statistically significant association between spironolactone use in men and women above age 18 years and risks of breast cancer (RR 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.22),ovarian cancer (1.52; 0.84-2.20),bladder cancer (0.89; 0.71-1.07);kidney cancer (0.96; 0.85-1.07),gastric cancer (1.02; 0.80-1.24),or esophageal cancer (1.09”
From Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris (2024) · cites this paper as [238]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 49
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]2. Searle TN, Al-Niaimi F, Ali FR. Spironolactone in dermatology: uses in acne and beyond. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;45(8):986-993. doi:10.1111/ced. 14340 · DOI
- Authors
- Bommareddy, K., Hamade, H., Lopez-Olivo, M. A., Wehner, M., Tosh, T., & Barbieri, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Hofstra University (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Albany Medical College (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barbieri, John S.
- Venue
- JAMA Dermatology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2022-03-01
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275
- ISSN
- 2168-6068 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8829743
- OpenAlex
- W4210873194
- Semantic Scholar
- f4fef2ad4c2a5037993bd6710d5871a45f2b0d1a
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
- Keywords
- spironolactone, cancer risk, breast cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, tumorigenicity, off-label drug use, hirsutism, androgenetic alopecia, hidradenitis, adverse drug reactions, drug safety, FDA warning, confidence intervals, relative risk, odds ratio, relative risk reduction
- MeSH terms
- Acne Vulgaris, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Hirsutism, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Spironolactone, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review