Cited by 172Healthcare cost, quality, practicesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Reassurance After Diagnostic Testing With a Low Pretest Probability of Serious Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rolfe, Alexandra, Burton, Christopher·2013·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Diagnostic tests are often ordered by physicians in patients with a low pretest probability of disease to rule out conditions and reassure the patient. OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of diagnostic tests on worry about illness, anxiety, symptom persistence, and subsequent use of health care resources in patients with a low pretest probability of serious illness. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations electronic databases through December 31, 2011, for eligible randomized controlled trials. We independently identified studies for inclusion and extracted the data. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. We performed meta-analysis if heterogeneity was low or moderate (I2 < 50%). RESULTS: Fourteen randomized controlled trials that included 3828 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed with outcomes categorized as short term (≤3 months) or long term (>3 months). Three trials showed no overall effect of diagnostic tests on illness worry (odds ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.55-1.39]), and 2 showed no effect on nonspecific anxiety (standardized mean difference, 0.06 [-0.16 to 0.28]). Ten trials showed no overall long-term effect on symptom persistence (odds ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.85-1.15]). Eleven trials measured subsequent primary care visits. We observed a high level of heterogeneity among trials (I2 = 80%). Meta-analysis after exclusion of outliers suggested a small reduction in visits after investigation (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.62-0.96]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Diagnostic tests for symptoms with a low risk of serious illness do little to reassure patients, decrease their anxiety, or resolve their symptoms, although the tests may reduce further primary care visits. Further research is needed to maximize reassurance from medically necessary tests and to develop safe strategies for managing patients without testing when an abnormal result is unlikely.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2762

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tests for symptoms with low risk of serious illness did not decrease illness anxiety or alleviate symptoms.

    “Tests for symptoms with low risk of serious illness did not decrease illness anxiety or alleviate symptoms. (11)”

    From Approach to the patient with multiple somatic symptoms (2021) · cites this paper as [11]

  • Physicians overestimate the value of diagnostic testing in reassuring patients.

    “A meta-analysis by Rolfe and Burton found that physicians overestimate the value of diagnostic testing in reassuring patients.”

    From Approach to the patient with multiple somatic symptoms (2021) · cites this paper as [11]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 172

Authors
Rolfe, A., & Burton, C.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Burton, Christopher
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2013-03-25
Volume
173
Issue
6
Pages
407
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085763831
Cited by
172
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13
FWCI
30.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
diagnostic testing, reassurance, anxiety, symptom persistence, health care utilization, primary care visits, unnecessary testing
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Disease, Humans, Probability, Severity of Illness Index, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sickness Impact Profile, Risk Assessment, Disease Management, Unnecessary Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review