Effect of Medicare’s Nonpayment for Hospital-Acquired Conditions: Lessons for Future Policy
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: In 2008, Medicare implemented the Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HACs) Initiative, a policy denying incremental payment for 8 complications of hospital care, also known as never events. The regulation's effect on these events has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To measure the association between Medicare's nonpayment policy and 4 outcomes addressed by the HACs Initiative: central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs), and injurious inpatient falls. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Quasi-experimental study of adult nursing units from 1381 US hospitals participating in the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI), a program of the American Nurses Association. The NDNQI data were combined with American Hospital Association, Medicare Cost Report, and local market data to examine adjusted outcomes. Multilevel models were used to evaluate the effect of Medicare's nonpayment policy on never events. EXPOSURES: United States hospitals providing treatment for Medicare patients were subject to the new payment policy beginning in October 2008. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Changes in unit-level rates of HAPUs, injurious falls, CLABSIs, and CAUTIs after initiation of the policy. RESULTS: Medicare's nonpayment policy was associated with an 11% reduction in the rate of change in CLABSIs (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.95) and a 10% reduction in the rate of change in CAUTIs (IRR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95), but was not associated with a significant change in injurious falls (IRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00) or HAPUs (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.01). Consideration of unit-, hospital-, and market-level factors did not significantly alter our findings. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The HACs Initiative was associated with improvements in CLABSI and CAUTI trends, conditions for which there is strong evidence that better hospital processes yield better outcomes. However, the HACs Initiative was not associated with improvements in HAPU or injurious fall trends, conditions for which there is less evidence that changing hospital processes leads to significantly better outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Enhanced infection control practices, including appropriate catheter use, antibiotic stewardship, and antifungal prophylaxis practices, might be responsible for some of the decreases in candidemia incidence.
“Enhanced infection control practices, including appropriate catheter use to limit catheter-related bloodstream infections (42–44), antibiotic stewardship, and antifungal prophylaxis practices, might be responsible for some of the decreases.”
From Population-Based Active Surveillance for Culture-Confirmed Candidemia — Four Sites, United States, 2012–2016 (2019) · cites this paper as [44]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 147
- Authors
- Waters, T. M., Daniels, M. J., Bazzoli, G. J., Perencevich, E., Dunton, N., Staggs, V. S., Potter, C., Fareed, N., Liu, M., & Shorr, R. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Waters, Teresa M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-03-01
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347
- ISSN
- 2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5508870
- OpenAlex
- W2153110466
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 13
- FWCI
- 61.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS020627)
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG033005)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
- Keywords
- never events, central line-associated bloodstream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, hospital-acquired pressure ulcers, hospital quality improvement, Medicare payment policy, nursing units, National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators, hospital-acquired conditions
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Adult, Catheterization, Central Venous, Cross Infection, Pressure Ulcer, Medicare, Hospitalization, Humans, United States, Urinary Catheterization, Urinary Tract Infections, Models, Statistical, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sepsis, Insurance Coverage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review