Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms

Tosteson, Anna N. A., Fryback, Dennis G., Hammond, Cristina S., Hanna, Lucy G., Grove, Margaret R., Brown, Mary, Wang, Qianfei, Lindfors, Karen +1 more·2014·JAMA Internal Medicine
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.981

Cited by (217)

Items 101–200 of 217

  1. Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations
    Chiang‐Hua Chang, Julie Bynum, Tracy Onega, Carrie Hoverman Colla, Jon D. Lurie, Anna N.A. Tosteson · 2016 · Journal of Women s Health
  2. The Effect of False-positive Mammograms on Antidepressant and Anxiolytic Initiation
    Joel E. Segel, Rajesh Balkrishnan, Richard A. Hirth · 2017 · Medical Care
  3. Spatially tracked whole‐breast three‐dimensional ultrasound system toward point‐of‐care breast cancer screening in high‐risk women with dense breasts
    Claire Keun Sun Park, Shuwei Xing, Samuel Papernick, Nathan Orlando, Eric Knull, Carla du Toit, Jeffrey Scott Bax, Lori Gardi, Kevin C. Barker, David Tessier et al. · 2022 · Medical Physics
  4. Integrating age, BMI, and serum N-glycans detected by MALDI mass spectrometry to classify suspicious mammogram findings as benign lesions or breast cancer
    Calvin R.K. Blaschke, Elizabeth Goodwin Hill, Anand S. Mehta, Peggi M. Angel, Christine Laronga, Richard R. Drake · 2022 · Scientific Reports
  5. Advanced Medical Imaging Analytics in Breast Cancer Diagnosis
    Yinlin Fu, Bhavika Patel, Teresa Wu, Jing Li, Fei Gao · 2019 · Women in engineering and science
  6. Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging
    Xin Wang, Nikita Moriakov, Yuan Gao, Tianyu Zhang, Luyi Han, Ritse M. Mann · 2022 · Medical radiology
  7. Screening Breast Ultrasound: Where Are We Today?
    Elsa M. Arribas, Gary J. Whitman, Nanette D. De Bruhl · 2016 · Current Breast Cancer Reports
  8. Annotation-efficient, patch-based, explainable deep learning using curriculum method for breast cancer detection in screening mammography
    Ozden Camurdan, Toygar Tanyel, Esma Aktufan Cerekci, Deniz Can Alis, Emine Meltem, Nurper Denizoğlu, Mustafa Ege Şeker, İlkay Öksüz, Ercan Karaarslan · 2025 · Insights into Imaging
  9. Organization Communication Factors and Abnormal Mammogram Follow-up: a Qualitative Study Among Ethnically Diverse Women Across Three Healthcare Systems
    Jazmine D. Kenny, Leah Karliner, Karla M. Kerlikowske, Celia Patricia Kaplan, Ana Fernandez-Lamothe, Nancy J. Burke · 2020 · Journal of General Internal Medicine
  10. Screening Digital Mammography Recall Rate: Does It Change with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Experience?
    Olivia DiPrete, Ana P. Lourenço, Grayson Luderman Baird, Martha B. Mainiero · 2017 · Radiology
  11. Online or Offline: Does It Matter? A Review of Existing Interpretation Approaches and Their Effect on Screening Mammography Metrics, Patient Satisfaction, and Cost
    Shruthi Ram, Tyler Campbell, Ana P. Lourenço · 2021 · Journal of Breast Imaging
  12. Health State Utilities Associated with False-Positive Cancer Screening Results
    Louis S. Matza, Timothy A. Howell, Eric T. Fung, Sam M. Janes, Michael V. Seiden, Allan K. Hackshaw, Lincoln D. Nadauld, Hayley Karn, Karen Chung · 2024 · PharmacoEconomics - Open
  13. You get the best of both worlds? Integrating deep learning and traditional machine learning for breast cancer risk prediction
    João Mendes, Bernardo Oliveira, Carolina Araújo, Joana Galrão, Nuno C. Garcia, Nuno Matela · 2025 · Computers in Biology and Medicine
  14. Long-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening: A Modeling Study
    Matthew Andersen, Natalia Kunst, Ilana B. Richman · 2025 · Value in Health
  15. Connecting algorithmic fairness and fair outcomes in a sociotechnical simulation case study of AI-assisted healthcare
    Emma A. M. Stanley, Roger Y. Tsang, Haley Gillett, Raissa Souza, Vibujithan Vigneshwaran, Chris Kang, Melissa D. McCradden, Matthias Wilms, Nils D. Forkert · 2025 · Nature Communications
  16. The impact of population screening for cardiovascular disease on quality of life
    Rikke Søgaard, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Jes Sanddal Lindholt · 2023 · European Heart Journal Open
  17. Head-to-head comparison of perfluorobutane contrast-enhanced US and multiparametric MRI for breast cancer: a prospective, multicenter study
    Manlin Lang, Ping Liang, Huiming Shen, Hang Li, Ning Yang, Bo Chen, Yixu Chen, Hong Ding, Weiping Yang, Xiaohui Ji et al. · 2023 · Breast Cancer Research
  18. Risco de resultado falso positivo no rastreamento mamográfico do Brasil
    Renata Oliveira Maciel dos Santos, Mônica de Assis, Maria Beatriz Kneipp Dias, Jeane Gláucia Tomazelli · 2023 · Cadernos de Saúde Pública
  19. Integrating Customer Intimacy Into Radiology to Improve the Patient Perspective: The Case of Breast Cancer Screening
    Chloe M. Chhor, Cecilia L. Mercado · 2016 · American Journal of Roentgenology
  20. Patient-centered Weight Tracking as an Early Cancer Detection Strategy
    Jonathan J. Hue, Sarah Coseo Markt, Goutham Rao, Jordan Michael Winter · 2020 · Journal of Cancer Prevention
  21. How to Minimize Patient Anxiety From Screening Mammography
    Vidya R Pai, Murray Rebner · 2021 · Journal of Breast Imaging
  22. Human-AI Complementarity in Diagnostic Radiology: The Case of Double Reading
    Isaac Anderson Wagner, Kaustubh Chakradeo · 2025 · Philosophy & Technology
  23. False-Positive Recall and False-Positive Biopsy Rates in Mammography Screening: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis
    Stefanie Weigel, Hans‐Werner Hense, Veronika Weyer‐Elberich, Joachim Gerß, Walter Leonhard Heindel, for the TOSYMA Screening Trial Group, Jörg Czwoydzinski, Alexander Sommer, Thomas Decker, Susanne Wienbeck et al. · 2025 · Radiology
  24. Breast Biopsies are Minimally Painful, Exceed Patient Expectations, and Do Not Represent a Genuine Lasting Harm for Most Women
    Andrew Dennis Mosier, David Semerad, Don Smith, Alice Rim, Bethanie Hammond · 2016 · The Breast Journal
  25. Advances in Breast Imaging with Current Screening Recommendations and Controversies
    Cimmie L. Shahan, Ginger P. Layne · 2022 · Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
  26. Assessment of Enhancement Kinetics Improves the Specificity of Abbreviated Breast MRI: Performance in an Enriched Cohort
    Haejung Kim, Eun Young Ko, Ka Eun Kim, Myoung Kyoung Kim, Ji Soo Choi, Eun Ko, Boo‐Kyung Han · 2022 · Diagnostics
  27. A situational analysis of breast cancer early detection services in Trinidad and Tobago
    Kimberly Badal, Fidel S Rampersad, Wayne A. Warner, Adetunji T. Toriola, Hamish P. Mohammed, Harold-Alexis Scheffel, Rehanna Ali, Murrie Moosoodeen, Siva Konduru, Adaila Russel et al. · 2017 · Cancer Causes & Control
  28. False-positive mammography and mammography screening intentions among black women: the influence of emotions and coping strategies
    Deeonna E. Farr, Heather M. Brandt, Daniela B. Friedman, Swann Arp Adams, Cheryl A. Armstead, Jeanette Fulton, Douglas Bull · 2019 · Ethnicity and Health
  29. Psychological Outcomes After a False Positive Mammogram: Preliminary Evidence for Ethnic Differences Across Time
    Yamilé Molina, Shirley A.A. Beresford, Beti Thompson · 2016 · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
  30. Mammography Screening Guideline Controversies: Opportunities to Improve Patient Engagement in Screening
    Anand Kumar Narayan, Constance Dobbins Lehman · 2020 · Journal of the American College of Radiology
  31. Uptake and outcomes of small intestinal and urinary tract cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome
    Jeshua DeJesse, Ravy K. Vajravelu, Christina M. Dudzik, Gillain Constantino, Jessica M. Long, Kirk J. Wangensteen, Kathleen D. Valverde, Bryson W. Katona · 2021 · World Journal of Clinical Oncology
  32. Tumor volume doubling time estimated from digital breast tomosynthesis mammograms distinguishes invasive breast cancers from benign lesions
    Negar Sadeghipour, Joseph Tseng, Kristen Anderson, Shivani Ayalasomayajula, Andrew Kozlov, Debra M. Ikeda, Wendy B. DeMartini, Sharon Seiko Hori · 2022 · European Radiology
  33. Patient preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review update to inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
    Jennifer Pillay, Samantha Guitard, Sholeh Rahman, Sabrina Saba, Ashiqur Rahman, Liza M Bialy, Nicole Gehring, Maria C Tan, Alex Melton, Lisa Hartling · 2024 · Systematic Reviews
  34. Screening mammography among nursing home residents in the United States: Current guidelines and practice
    Deborah Sara Mack, Mara Meyer Epstein, Catherine E Dube, Robin E. Clark, Kate L. Lapane · 2018 · Journal of Geriatric Oncology
  35. Factors Associated With False-Positive Recalls in Mammography Screening
    Xinhe Mao, Wei He, Keith Humphreys, Mikael Eriksson, Natalie Holowko, Fredrik Strand, Per N Hall, Kamila Czene · 2023 · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  36. Quantifying performance thresholds for recommending screening mammography: a revealed preference analysis of USPSTF guidelines
    Anand Kumar Narayan, Elena B. Elkin, Constance Dobbins Lehman, Elizabeth Ann Morris · 2018 · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
  37. A Multi-view Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Reduction of False Positive Findings in Breast Cancer Screening
    Nouha Derbel, Hedi Tmar, Adel Mahfoudhi · 2020 · International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing
  38. Designing Radiology Outcomes Studies—Essential Principles
    Stella K. Kang, Alvin I. Mushlin · 2016 · Academic Radiology
  39. A near-field radar mechatronics system for early detection of breast cancer
    Ashkan Ghanbarzadeh-Dagheyan · 2016
  40. The Diagnostic Accuracy of an Abbreviated vs. a Full MRI Breast Protocol in Detecting Breast Lobular Carcinoma: A Single-Center ROC Study
    Francis L. Zarb, Deborah Mizzi, Paul Bezzina, Leanne Galea · 2025 · Diagnostics
  41. Preliminary Results of a New Auxiliary Mechatronic Near-Field Radar System to 3D Mammography for Early Detection of Breast Cancer
    Ashkan Ghanbarzadeh-Dagheyan, Ali Molaei, Richard Obermeier, Andrew Westwood, Aida Kuri Martinez, Jose Martinez Lorenzo · 2018 · Sensors
  42. Using Risk Stratification to Optimize Mammography Screening in Chinese Women
    Kathy S. M. Leung, Joseph Tsz Kei Wu, Irene Oi-ling Wong, Xiao‐Ou Shu, Wei Zheng, Wanqing Wen, US Khoo, Roger K.C. Ngan, Ava Kwong, Gabriel Matthew Leung · 2021 · JNCI Cancer Spectrum
  43. Factors associated with false-positive screening mammography in São Paulo, Brazil
    Alice Barros Câmara, Luciane Simões Duarte, Lise Cury, Victor Wünsch Filho · 2025 · Scientific Reports
  44. Stereotactic Breast Biopsy With Benign Results Does Not Negatively Affect Future Screening Adherence
    Alana Amarosa Lewin, Yiming Gao, Leng Leng Lin Young, Marissa L. Albert, James S. Babb, Hildegard K. Toth, Linda P. Moy, Samantha Lynn Heller · 2018 · Journal of the American College of Radiology
  45. Analysis of Technical Repeat Studies in Screening Mammography
    Sarah R. Martaindale, Tanya W. Moseley, Lumarie Santiago, Monica L. Huang, Callie Sullivan, Roland L. Bassett, Gary J. Whitman · 2023 · Journal of Breast Imaging
  46. A deep learning approach for contrast-agent-free breast lesion detection and classification using adversarial synthesis of contrast-enhanced mammograms
    Manar N. Amin, Muhammad Ali Rushdi, Rasha Mohamed Kamal, Amr Farouk Ibrahim Moustafa, Mohamed Gomaa, Noha M. Fouad, Ahmed M. Mahmoud · 2025 · Image and Vision Computing
  47. Predictors for psychosocial consequences of screening for liver diseases: A data-driven approach
    Urs Alexander Fichtner, Andy Maun, Erik Farin‐Glattacker · 2025 · PLoS ONE
  48. Análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo de las campañas argentinas de prevención de cáncer de mama difundidas mediante imágenes fijas en redes sociales durante octubre del 2019
    Sofía Victoria Gürtler, Manuel Rodríguez Tablado, Mariela Alejandra Weisbrot, María Victoria Ruiz Yanzi, Karin Silvana Kopitowski, Sergio Terrasa · 2022 · Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
  49. Patient experiences with clinical confirmatory genetic testing after using direct-to-consumer raw DNA and third-party genetic interpretation services
    Tiffany Tuyen Minh Nguyen, Kelly E. Ormond, Scott M. Weissman, Helen J. Kim, Chloe M. Reuter · 2022 · Translational Behavioral Medicine
  50. Imaging Surveillance of Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer
    Janie M. Lee, Nehmat Houssami · 2016 · Elsevier eBooks
  51. Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Controversies
    Kimberly Funaro, Jennifer S. Drukteinis, Shannon Falcon · 2017 · Southern Medical Journal
  52. Routine use of both mammography and MRI surveillance in patients with previous ‘mammogram occult’ breast cancer: experience from a tertiary centre
    Gaurav Jyoti Bansal, David Purchase, Matthew Wray · 2020 · Postgraduate Medical Journal
  53. Editoral commentary: Beyond the early adopter: The smartwatch ECG goes mainstream
    David J. Cho · 2019 · Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine
  54. Methodological Considerations in Evaluating Breast Cancer Screening Studies
    Anand Kumar Narayan, Randy C. Miles, Ryan W. Woods, Lucy B. Spalluto, Elizabeth S. Burnside · 2024 · Journal of Breast Imaging
  55. Examining barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based genetic risk-stratified breast cancer screening in primary care
    Yue Guan, Haley Barge, Cam Escoffery, Michele Cellai, Susana A. Alfonso, Theodore M. Johnson · 2025 · Frontiers in Cancer Control and Society
  56. Beyond the black box: lessons in explainability from AI in mammography
    Andrea Ciardiello, Anna Rita D'Angelo, Luigi De Angelis, S. Giagu, Evis Sala, Guido Gigante · 2026 · Artificial Intelligence Review
  57. Weighing the Benefits and Harms
    Mireille J. M. Broeders, Theodora M. Ripping, Rebecca A. Hubbard · 2016 · Elsevier eBooks
  58. Why Was the US Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 Breast Cancer Screening Recommendation So Objectionable? A Historical Analysis
    Barron H. Lerner, Graham Curtiss-Rowlands · 2022 · Milbank Quarterly
  59. Reducing ' probably benign ' assessments in normal mammograms: The role of radiologist experience
    Mohammad Ahmmad Rawashdeh, Patrick Brennan · 2023 · European Journal of Radiology Open
  60. Early performance measures following regular versus irregular screening attendance in the population-based screening program for breast cancer in Norway
    Jonas E Thy, Marthe Larsen, Einar Vigeland, Henrik Wethe Koch, Tone Hovda, Solveig S. H. Hofvind · 2023 · Journal of Medical Screening
  61. The effectiveness of pretreatment video-based psychoeducation for patients with breast cancer
    Toshiko Sato, Makiko Seto, Takafumi Sangai, Norihiko Sengoku, Hiroshi Nishimiya, Mariko Kikuchi, Ayaka Shimizu, Yumi Iwamitsu · 2023 · Palliative & Supportive Care
  62. A comparison of breast cancer incidence and cancer stages before and after the introduction of the Austrian national breast cancer screening program in the federal state of Salzburg
    Simon Peter Gampenrieder, Marc Vaisband, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Lukas Weiß, Bernhard Jaud, Martin Sprenger, Richard Greil · 2025 · Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
  63. Breast Cancer Image Classification Using Phase Features and Deep Ensemble Models
    Edgar Omar Molina-Molina, Victor Hugo Diaz-Ramirez · 2025 · Applied Sciences
  64. Mammographic Surveillance in Older Women With Breast Cancer in Canada and the United States: Are We Choosing Wisely?
    Danielle Lee Rodin, Rachel Glicksman, Kathryn Clark, Pragya Kakani, Matthew C. Cheung, Simron Singh, Meredith B. Rosenthal, Anna D. Sinaiko · 2021 · Practical Radiation Oncology
  65. How to Perform a House Call
    Jennifer Hayashi, Jonathan Ripp, Jessica L. Colburn · 2015 · Springer eBooks
  66. Anxiety and Breast Imaging-Can Community Education by a Breast Radiologist Decrease Anxiety and Improve Knowledge?
    Ana P. Lourenço, Grayson Luderman Baird · 2017 · The Breast Journal
  67. Breast Cancer Screening
    Steven J. Rockoff, Joseph D. Calandra · 2018 · Springer eBooks
  68. Screening trials and design
    Janie M. Lee, Constance Dobbins Lehman, Diana L. Miglioretti · 2016
  69. Breast cancer screening—towards a broader coverage of the general population
    CY Lui, Julian CY Fong, Martin C. S. Wong · 2022 · Hong Kong Medical Journal
  70. Tips for Addressing Screening Concerns: “Harms of Screening”
    Angela I Choe, Emel Kaya Aumann, Claudia J. Kasales, Alison Lynn Chetlen, Rebecca T. Sivarajah · 2024 · Journal of Breast Imaging
  71. The New Proposed U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Breast Cancer Screening for Women in Their 40s
    Stamatia V. Destounis, Andrea L. Arieno · 2024 · Annals of Internal Medicine
  72. Development of uMUC-1 Targeted NEMO Particles with pH-Activatable MRI Signals for Enhanced Detection of Malignant Breast Cancer Cells
    Dhruvi M. Panchal, Alexia R. Gorman, Celia Martinez de la Torre, Barrick M. Silverman, Anthony J. Scalzo, Hunter T. Snoderly, Benoît Driesschaert, Margaret F. Bennewitz · 2025 · ACS Applied Bio Materials
  73. An Explainable Deep Learning Pipeline for Breast Cancer Detection Using ResNet-50 and Grad-CAM
    Zahra Baiti Ayu Azizah, Siregar Sp · 2025 · International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM)
  74. DBT_DCNN: a new convolutional neural network for mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis
    Gianfranco Paternò, Matteo Bianchini, P. Cardarelli, Angelo Taibi, Roberta Ricciardi, Paolo Russo, Giovanni Mettivier · 2026 · Health and Technology
  75. Impact of AI-based Slab Reconstruction Technology on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Manisha Bahl, Sarah Mercaldo, Leslie R. Lamb · 2026 · Radiology
  76. Developing a breast cancer screening decision aid in Spanish for average-risk women: a mixed methods study
    Paula Riganti, María Victoria Ruiz Yanzi, Juan Víctor Ariel Franco, Josefina Chiodi, Vélez Regueiro, Karin Silvana Kopitowski · 2024 · Medwave
  77. Investigating the link between the radiological experience and the allocation of an 'equivocal finding'
    Mohammad Ahmmad Rawashdeh, Camila Vidotti, Warwick B. Lee, Sarah Jayne Lewis, Claudia R. Mello-Thoms, Warren Michael Reed, Kriscia A. Tapia, Patrick Brennan · 2016 · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
  78. Current Controversies and Changing Standards in Mammography
    Donna M. Plecha, Holly N. Marshall · 2016 · Journal of Radiology Nursing
  79. Breast abnormalities segmentation using the wavelet transform coefficients aggregation
    Behrouz Niroomandfam · 2019 · Iranian Journal of Breast Disease
  80. Pushing anxiety as a risk of screening mammography is benevolent sexism and bad for women's health outcomes
    Laurie R. Margolies, Shivani Chaudhry · 2020 · Clinical Imaging
  81. A Vision of the Future
    José Russo · 2021 · Springer eBooks
  82. A Multi-View DCNN Based Method for Breast Cancer Screening
    Nouha Derbel, Hedi Tmar, Adel Mahfoudhi · 2021 · International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA)
  83. Epidemiology and Screening in RCC
    Sabrina Helena Rossi, Grant Duncan Stewart · 2022 · Springer eBooks
  84. Screening mammography starting at age 40: Still relevant
    Karthik Ghosh, Dietlind L. Wahner‐Roedler, Kathleen R. Brandt · 2015 · Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  85. A Multi-Reader Multi-Case Study Comparing Mammographic Breast Cancer Detection Rates on Mammograms by Resident and Consultant Radiologists in Singapore with and Without the Use of AI Assistance
    Serene Si Ning Goh, Hao Du, Loon Ying Tan, E. Seah, Wai Keat Lau, Alvin Hong Zhi Ng, Shi Wei Desmond Lim, Han Yang Ong, Samuel Lau, Yi Liang Tan et al. · 2023 · SSRN Electronic Journal
  86. Breast Cancer Screening in the Older Woman
    Mara A. Schonberg · 2016 · Elsevier eBooks
  87. A retrospective audit of the first screening round of the Maltese breast screening programme
    Deborah Mizzi, Francis L. Zarb, A. Dennis · 2016 · Radiography
  88. Mammogram and Tomosynthesis Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks
    Xiaofei Zhang · 2017 · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)
  89. Overview of Radiologic Quality Assurance and the Imaging Evaluation of Breast Lesions
    Priti Shah · 2017 · Springer eBooks
  90. Effect of Screening Mammography on Other Preventive Services in Older Women
    Gary J. Whitman, Scott B. Cantor · 2018 · Radiology
  91. Screening Ultrasound for Women with Dense Breasts in the Age of Patient-centered Care
    Stamatia V. Destounis, Andrea L. Arieno, Amanda Santacroce · 2018 · American Journal of Sonography
  92. Überschaubarer Schaden?
    Urban & Vogel · 2014 · MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin
  93. Novel Applications of Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
    Yi Zhang · 2019 · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)
  94. Breast cancer screening: Helping patients navigate recommendations
    Sarah R. Martaindale · 2021 · The Breast Journal
  95. The Effects of the Breast Cancer Mammography Screening Programme in Women aged 40 to 84 years in Turku, Finland (1987-2009)
    Ilmo Parvinen · 2014 · UTUPub (University of Turku)
  96. Letter to the editor on article by Dinh et al. Is it ethical to incentivize mammography screening in Medicaid populations? – A policy review and conceptual analysis. By Stamatia Destounis, MD and Sarah Friedewald MD
    Stamatia V. Destounis, Sarah M. Friedewald · 2021 · Preventive Medicine
  97. Up-to-date breast cancer imaging
    Nataša Prvulović Bunović, Viktorija Vučaj-Ćirilović, Nikola Andjelic, Jasmina M. Boban · 2021 · Medicinski pregled
  98. Advance Technique for Early Detection of Breast Cancer Using Textual Analysis from Digital Mammogram
    Shawni Dutta et al. Shawni Dutta et al., TJPRC · 2021 · International journal of computer science engineering and information technology research
  99. SDoH-Aware Approach to Prostate Cancer Screening: Addressing Overdiagnosis of Prostate Cancer using PSA
    Ashley Adanna Lewis, Yash Samir Khandwala, Tina Hernandez‐Boussard, James D. Brooks · 2024 · medRxiv
  100. Introductory Remarks on Screening
    Jacques Balayla · 2024 · Springer eBooks