The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Florida’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program and Pill Mill Laws on Opioid Prescribing and Use
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) and pill mill laws are among the principal means states use to reduce prescription drug abuse and diversion, yet little high-quality evidence exists regarding their effect. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of Florida's PDMP and pill mill laws on overall and high-risk opioid prescribing and use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We applied comparative interrupted time-series analyses to IMS Health LifeLink LRx data to characterize the effect of PDMP and pill mill law implementation on a closed cohort of prescribers, retail pharmacies, and patients from July 2010 through September 2012 in Florida (intervention state) compared with Georgia (control state). We conducted sensitivity analyses, including varying length of observation and modifying requirements for continuous observation of individuals throughout the study period. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total opioid volume, mean morphine milligram equivalent (MME) per transaction, mean days' supply per transaction, and total number of opioid prescriptions dispensed. Analyses were conducted per prescriber and per patient, in aggregate and after stratifying by volume of baseline opioid prescribing for prescribers and use for patients. RESULTS: From July 2010 through September 2012, a cohort of 2.6 million patients, 431,890 prescribers, and 2829 pharmacies was associated with approximately 480 million prescriptions in Florida and Georgia, 7.7% of which were for opioids. Total monthly opioid volume, MME per transaction, days' supply, and prescriptions dispensed were higher in Florida than Georgia before implementation. Florida's laws were associated with statistically significant declines in opioid volume (2.5 kg/mo, P<.05; equivalent to approximately 500,000 5-mg tablets of hydrocodone bitartrate per month) and MME per transaction (0.45 mg/mo, P<.05), without any change in days' supply. Twelve months after implementation, the policies were associated with approximately a 1.4% decrease in opioid prescriptions, 2.5% decrease in opioid volume, and 5.6% decrease in MME per transaction. Reductions were limited to prescribers and patients with the highest baseline opioid prescribing and use. Sensitivity analyses, varying time windows, and enrollment criteria supported the main results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Florida's PDMP and pill mill laws were associated with modest decreases in opioid prescribing and use. Decreases were greatest among prescribers and patients with the highest baseline opioid prescribing and use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Prescription Opioid and Heroin Crisis: A Public Health Approach to an Epidemic of Addiction
Kolodny, A., Courtwright, D. T., Hwang, C. S., Kreiner, P., Eadie, J. L., Clark, T. W., & Alexander, G. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122957 · Cited by 1,388
Self-citation
Cited by
Prescription Opioid Analgesics Commonly Unused After Surgery: A Systematic Review
Bicket, M. C., Long, J. J., Pronovost, P. J., Alexander, G. C., & Wu, C. L. (2017) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0831 · Cited by 873
Self-citationGlobal patterns of opioid use and dependence: harms to populations, interventions, and future action
Degenhardt, L., Grebely, J., Stone, J., Hickman, M., Vickerman, P., Marshall, B. D. L., Bruneau, J., Altice, F. L., Henderson, G., Rahimi-Movaghar, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32229-9 · Cited by 832
Patrick, S. W., Fry, C. E., Jones, T. F., & Buntin, M. B. (2016) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1496 · Cited by 299
Today’s fentanyl crisis: Prohibition’s Iron Law, revisited
Beletsky, L., & Davis, C. S. (2017) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.050 · Cited by 283
A Systematic Review of Interventions and Programs Targeting Appropriate Prescribing of Opioids
Moride, Y. (2019) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj/2019.22.229 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Rutkow, L., Chang, H.-Y., Daubresse, M., Webster, D. W., Stuart, E. A., & Alexander, G. C.
- Venue
- JAMA Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-10-01
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1642
- ISSN
- 2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1871811247
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Florida’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program and Pill Mill Laws on Opioid Prescribing and Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3931
- The paper
- Rutkow, L., Chang, H.-Y., Daubresse, M., Webster, D. W., Stuart, E. A., & Alexander, G. C. (2015). Effect of Florida’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program and Pill Mill Laws on Opioid Prescribing and Use. JAMA Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3931
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.