Cited by 47Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsInnovations in Medical EducationHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Internal Medicine Resident Computer Usage: An Electronic Audit of an Inpatient Service

Open access
Ouyang, David, Chen, Jonathan H., Hom, Jason, Chi, Jeffrey·2016·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

The first 6 months of the intern year was the most common period for NSIs, previously unreported in the literature.Dental residents were more likely to experience an NSI than other trainees, in contrast to literature findings that suggest surgery residents are at greatest risk. 8Previous literature excludes dental trainees.Dental residents may be more likely to experience an NSI based on the nature of their work (ie, the dark oral cavity with difficult illumination and learning mirrored image procedures).Resident education and training during orientation may reduce risk.For new residents, additional procedural skill simulation using sharp instruments may decrease NSI.However, a majority of residents felt comfortable in procedures with instruments causing injury. 3Despite resident-reported mastery, caution to avoid both overconfidence and decreased attention to NSI risk is warranted.We found that PGY-1 residents, especially during the first 6 months of training, are at greatest risk of NSI.Highest injury rates were observed for dentistry, obstetrics and gynecology, and surgery.Source patient seropositivity was low in this series.Simulation training during orientation and timeout reminders may increase procedural experience, decrease complacency, and reduce NSIs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6831

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Chi J Verghese A Clinical education and the electronic health record: the flipped patient JAMA 2014 312 22 2331 2332 25490318
  2. [2]Hripcsak G Vawdrey DK Fred MR Bostwick SB Use of electronic clinical documentation: time spent and team interactions J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 18 2 112 117 21292706 PMC3116265
  3. [3]Lowe HJ Ferris TA Hernandez PM Weber SC STRIDE: an integrated standards-based translational research informatics platform AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2009 2009 391 395 20351886 PMC2815452
  4. [4]Oxentenko AS West CP Popkave C Weinberger SE Kolars JC Time spent on clinical documentation: a survey of internal medicine residents and program directors Arch Intern Med 2010 170 4 377 380 20177042
  5. [5]Block L Habicht R Wu AW In the wake of the 2003 and 2011 duty hours regulations, how do internal medicine interns spend their time? J Gen Intern Med 2013 28 8 1042 1047 23595927 PMC3710392

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ouyang, D., Chen, J. H., Hom, J., & Chi, J.
Affiliations
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2016-02-01
Volume
176
Issue
2
Pages
252
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2192864038
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Services Research and Development
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (K01ES026837)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025744)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
needlestick injuries, occupational exposure, dental residents, internal medicine residents, residency training, simulation-based training, complacency
MeSH terms
Hospital Departments, Humans, Internship and Residency, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review