The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Hospital Risk of Data Breaches
Open accessAbstract
mended screening to women 40 years or older.Our findings are largely consistent with a 2014 survey of PCPs from 4 clinical networks where similar proportions of physicians recommended screening with higher rates noted among gynecologists.5 We also found sharp differences in recommendations based on which guidelines physicians trusted most, which may suggest that current practices reflect both varying adherence to guidelines as well as differences in which guidelines are trusted.The results provide an important benchmark as guidelines continue evolving and underscore the need to delineate barriers and facilitators to implementing guidelines in clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite these potential benefits, technology carries risks related to privacy, bias, coercion, liability, and data sharing that could harm patients in expected (e.g., denial of health insurance) and unintended ways (33, 44, 74, 78, 79–81).”
From Key Considerations for Incorporating Conversational AI in Psychotherapy (2019) · cites this paper as [74]
In the citing paper
“and conversational AI for health is an emerging field with limited research on efficacy and safety (40, 63, 74).”
From Key Considerations for Incorporating Conversational AI in Psychotherapy (2019) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, G., Jiang, J. (., & Flasher, R.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Ball State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bai, Ge
- Venue
- JAMA Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-06-01
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 878
- ISSN
- 2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5818824
- OpenAlex
- W2604967160
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12
- FWCI
- 13.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Thoreau and American Literature
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Keywords
- data breaches, health information privacy, patient data protection
- MeSH terms
- Confidentiality, Hospital Bed Capacity, Hospitals, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Risk Factors, Computer Security, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital Risk of Data Breaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0336
- The paper
- Bai, G., Jiang, J. (., & Flasher, R. (2017). Hospital Risk of Data Breaches. JAMA Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0336
