Cited by 150Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPatient Safety and Medication Errors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and Validation of a Tool to Identify Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at High Risk of Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department or Hospital Use

Open access

Abstract

Importance: Hypoglycemia-related emergency department (ED) or hospital use among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is clinically significant and possibly preventable. Objective: To develop and validate a tool to categorize risk of hypoglycemic-related utilization in patients with T2D. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using recursive partitioning with a split-sample design, we created a classification tree based on potential predictors of hypoglycemia-related ED or hospital use. The resulting model was transcribed into a tool for practical application and tested in 1 internal and 2 fully independent, external samples. Development and internal testing was conducted in a split sample of 206 435 patients with T2D from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated health care system. The tool was externally tested in 1 335 966 Veterans Health Administration and 14 972 Group Health Cooperative patients with T2D. Exposures: Based on a literature review, we identified 156 candidate predictor variables (prebaseline exposures) using data collected from electronic medical records. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hypoglycemia-related ED or hospital use during 12 months of follow-up. Results: The derivation sample (n = 165 148) had a mean (SD) age of 63.9 (13.0) years and included 78 576 (47.6%) women. The crude annual rate of at least 1 hypoglycemia-related ED or hospital encounter in the KPNC derivation sample was 0.49%. The resulting hypoglycemia risk stratification tool required 6 patient-specific inputs: number of prior episodes of hypoglycemia-related utilization, insulin use, sulfonylurea use, prior year ED use, chronic kidney disease stage, and age. We categorized the predicted 12-month risk of any hypoglycemia-related utilization as high (>5%), intermediate (1%-5%), or low (<1%). In the internal validation sample, 2.0%, 10.7%, and 87.3% were categorized as high, intermediate, and low risk, respectively, with observed 12-month hypoglycemia-related utilization rates of 6.7%, 1.4%, and 0.2%, respectively. There was good discrimination in the internal validation KPNC sample (C statistic = 0.83) and both external validation samples (Veterans Health Administration: C statistic = 0.81; Group Health Cooperative: C statistic = 0.79). Conclusions and Relevance: This hypoglycemia risk stratification tool categorizes the 12-month risk of hypoglycemia-related utilization in patients with T2D using only 6 inputs. This tool could facilitate targeted population management interventions, potentially reducing hypoglycemia risk and improving patient safety and quality of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3844

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 62 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–150 of 150

Metadata

Authors
Karter, A. J., Warton, E. M., Lipska, K. J., Ralston, J. D., Moffet, H. H., Jackson, G. G., Huang, E. S., & Miller, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Karter, Andrew J.
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2017-10-01
Volume
177
Issue
10
Pages
1461
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2749343537
Cited by
150
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3
FWCI
11.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG048359)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK105340, R01DK103721, R01DK081796, P30DK092949, P30DK092924)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, hypoglycemia, hospital utilization, risk stratification tools, classification trees, insulin use, chronic kidney disease, risk prediction model, external validation, Kaiser Permanente, Veterans Health Administration, Group Health Cooperative, electronic health records, hypoglycemia prevention
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, Risk Assessment, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review