Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 532

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perioperative Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving a Direct Oral Anticoagulant

Open access
Douketis, James D., Spyropoulos, Alex C., Duncan, Joanne, Carrier, Marc, Le Gal, Gregoire, Tafur, Alfonso J., Vanassche, Thomas, Verhamme, Peter, Shivakumar, Sudeep, Gross, Peter L., Lee, Agnes Y. Y., Yeo, Erik, Solymoss, Susan, Kassis, Jeannine, Le Templier, Geneviève, Kowalski, Stephen, Blostein, Mark, Shah, Vinay, MacKay, Elizabeth, Wu, Cynthia, Clark, Nathan P., Bates, Shannon M., Spencer, Frederick A., Arnaoutoglou, Eleni, Coppens, Michiel, Arnold, Donald M., Caprini, Joseph A., Li, Na, Moffat, Karen A., Syed, Summer, Schulman, Sam·2019·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who use a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and request elective surgery or procedure present a common clinical situation yet perioperative management is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of a standardized perioperative DOAC management strategy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Perioperative Anticoagulation Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) cohort study conducted at 23 clinical centers in Canada, the United States, and Europe enrolled and screened patients from August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2018. Participants (n = 3007) had AF; were 18 years of age or older; were long-term users of apixaban, dabigatran etexilate, or rivaroxaban; were scheduled for an elective surgery or procedure; and could adhere to the DOAC therapy interruption protocol. INTERVENTIONS: A simple standardized perioperative DOAC therapy interruption and resumption strategy based on DOAC pharmacokinetic properties, procedure-associated bleeding risk, and creatinine clearance levels. The DOAC regimens were omitted for 1 day before a low-bleeding-risk procedure and 2 days before a high-bleeding-risk procedure. The DOAC regimens were resumed 1 day after a low-bleeding-risk procedure and 2 to 3 days after a high-bleeding-risk procedure. Follow-up of patients occurred for 30 days after the operation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism (ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and transient ischemic attack) and the proportion of patients with an undetectable or minimal residual anticoagulant level (<50 ng/mL) at the time of the procedure. RESULTS: The 3007 patients with AF (mean [SD] age of 72.5 [9.39] years; 1988 men [66.1%]) comprised 1257 (41.8%) in the apixaban cohort, 668 (22.2%) in the dabigatran cohort, and 1082 (36.0%) in the rivaroxaban cohort; 1007 patients (33.5%) had a high-bleeding-risk procedure. The 30-day postoperative rate of major bleeding was 1.35% (95% CI, 0%-2.00%) in the apixaban cohort, 0.90% (95% CI, 0%-1.73%) in the dabigatran cohort, and 1.85% (95% CI, 0%-2.65%) in the rivaroxaban cohort. The rate of arterial thromboembolism was 0.16% (95% CI, 0%-0.48%) in the apixaban cohort, 0.60% (95% CI, 0%-1.33%) in the dabigatran cohort, and 0.37% (95% CI, 0%-0.82%) in the rivaroxaban cohort. In patients with a high-bleeding-risk procedure, the rates of major bleeding were 2.96% (95% CI, 0%-4.68%) in the apixaban cohort and 2.95% (95% CI, 0%-4.76%) in the rivaroxaban cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, patients with AF who had DOAC therapy interruption for elective surgery or procedure, a perioperative management strategy without heparin bridging or coagulation function testing was associated with low rates of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2431

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 532

Metadata

Authors
Douketis, J. D., Spyropoulos, A. C., Duncan, J., Carrier, M., Le Gal, G., Tafur, A. J., Vanassche, T., Verhamme, P., Shivakumar, S., Gross, P. L., Lee, A. Y. Y., Yeo, E., Solymoss, S., Kassis, J., Le Templier, G., Kowalski, S., Blostein, M., Shah, V., MacKay, E., Wu, C., Clark, N. P., Bates, S. M., Spencer, F. A., Arnaoutoglou, E., Coppens, M., Arnold, D. M., Caprini, J. A., Li, N., Moffat, K. A., Syed, S., & Schulman, S.
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2019-11-01
Volume
179
Issue
11
Pages
1469
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964373888
Cited by
532
References
40
FWCI
36.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perioperative Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving a Direct Oral Anticoagulant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2431
The paper
Douketis, J. D., Spyropoulos, A. C., Duncan, J., Carrier, M., Le Gal, G., Tafur, A. J., Vanassche, T., Verhamme, P., Shivakumar, S., Gross, P. L., Lee, A. Y. Y., Yeo, E., Solymoss, S., Kassis, J., Le Templier, G., Kowalski, S., Blostein, M., Shah, V., MacKay, E., . . . Schulman, S. (2019). Perioperative Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving a Direct Oral Anticoagulant. JAMA Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2431

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.