Assessment of a personalized approach to predicting postprandial glycemic responses to food among individuals without diabetes
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Emerging evidence suggests that postprandial glycemic responses (PPGRs) to food may be influenced by and predicted according to characteristics unique to each individual, including anthropometric and microbiome variables. Interindividual diversity in PPGRs to food requires a personalized approach for the maintenance of healthy glycemic levels. Objectives: To describe and predict the glycemic responses of individuals to a diverse array of foods using a model that considers the physiology and microbiome of the individual in addition to the characteristics of the foods consumed. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study using a personalized predictive model enrolled 327 individuals without diabetes from October 11, 2016, to December 13, 2017, in Minnesota and Florida to be part of a study lasting 6 days. The study measured anthropometric variables, described the gut microbial composition, and assessed blood glucose levels every 5 minutes using a continuous glucose monitor. Participants logged their food and activity information for the duration of the study. A predictive model of individualized PPGRs to a diverse array of foods was trained and applied. Main Outcomes and Measures: Glycemic responses to food consumed over 6 days for each participant. The predictive model of personalized PPGRs considered individual features, including the microbiome, in addition to the features of the foods consumed. Results: Postprandial response to the same foods varied across 327 individuals (mean [SD] age, 45 [12] years; 78.0% female). A model predicting each individual's responses to food that considers several individual factors in addition to food features had better overall performance (R = 0.62) than current standard-of-care approaches using nutritional content alone (R = 0.34 for calories and R = 0.40 for carbohydrates) to control postprandial glycemic levels. Conclusions and Relevance: Across the cohort of adults without diabetes who were examined, a personalized predictive model that considers unique features of the individual, such as clinical characteristics, physiological variables, and the microbiome, in addition to nutrient content was more predictive than current dietary approaches that focus only on the calorie or carbohydrate content of foods. Providing individuals with tools to manage their glycemic responses to food based on personalized predictions of their PPGRs may allow them to maintain their blood glucose levels within limits associated with good health.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
95.1% of participants exhibited higher PPGRs with increased carbohydrate content.
“Although 95.1% of participants exhibited higher PPGRs with increased carbohydrate content, the degree of carbohydrate sensitivity varied greatly, highlighting diverse glycemic responses that were independent of carbohydrate intake levels.”
From Personalized nutrition in type 2 diabetes remission: application of digital twin technology for predictive glycemic control (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
The Results (page unavailable) report that PPGRs increased with carbohydrate proportion on average and that carbohydrate sensitivity varied substantially among participants. They do not report that 95.1% of participants had higher PPGRs with increased carbohydrate content, so the precise percentage is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe degree of carbohydrate sensitivity varied greatly, highlighting diverse glycemic responses independent of carbohydrate intake levels.
“Although 95.1% of participants exhibited higher PPGRs with increased carbohydrate content, the degree of carbohydrate sensitivity varied greatly, highlighting diverse glycemic responses that were independent of carbohydrate intake levels.”
From Personalized nutrition in type 2 diabetes remission: application of digital twin technology for predictive glycemic control (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
The Results report that carbohydrate sensitivity varied significantly and that responses ranged from low to high at any carbohydrate percentage. They also report an average increase in response with carbohydrate content, so the responses were not independent of intake in the strict sense. The cited passages do not substantiate the sentence’s 95.1% figure. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA recent study indicates substantial variability in PPGRs among individuals consuming identical standardized meals.
“A recent study (12) indicates substantial variability in PPGRs among individuals consuming identical standardized meals.”
From Personalized nutrition in type 2 diabetes remission: application of digital twin technology for predictive glycemic control (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
The initial literature review identified 316 registered clinical trials for AI interventions on ClinicalTrials.gov, of which 62 were completed and 7 had published results.
“There were 316 registered trials, of which 62 were completed and 7 had published results30,38–43.”
From Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 212
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lanzerstorfer P, Rechenmacher E, Lugmayr O, et al. Effects of various commercial whole-grain breads on postprandial blood glucose response and glycemic index in healthy subjects. Austin J Clin Med. 2018;5(1):1031.
- Authors
- Mendes-Soares, H., Raveh-Sadka, T., Azulay, S., Edens, K., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Cohen, Y., Ofek, T., Bachrach, D., Stevens, J., Colibaseanu, D., Segal, L., Kashyap, P., & Nelson, H.
- Affiliations
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- DayTwo, Adanim, Israel
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nelson, Heidi
- Venue
- JAMA Network Open
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-02-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e188102
- ISSN
- 2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6484621
- OpenAlex
- W2912759921
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK114007)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Keywords
- postprandial glycemic response, personalized prediction models, gut microbiota, blood glucose, continuous glucose monitoring, anthropometric variables, carbohydrate content, calorie content, non-diabetic adults, glycemic control
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Statistical, Cohort Studies, Postprandial Period, Precision Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review