Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospice Use and Hospitalizations at End-of-Life Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia
Open accessAbstract
Importance: The pool of studies examining ethnic and racial differences in hospice use and end-of-life hospitalizations among patients with dementia is limited and results are conflicting, making it difficult to assess health care needs of underresourced racial and ethnic groups. Objective: To explore differences in end-of-life utilization of hospice and hospital services among patients with dementia by race and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used national survey data from the Health and Retirement Study linked with Medicare and Medicaid claims that reflected a range of socioeconomic, health, and psychosocial characteristics. Eligible participants were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older diagnosed with dementia who died between 2000 and 2016. Analyses were performed from June to December 2021. Exposures: Race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: We examined the frequency and costs of hospice care, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations during the last 180 days of life among Medicare decedents with dementia. We analyzed the proportion of dementia decedents with advance care planning and their end-of-life care preferences. Results: The cohort sample included 5058 beneficiaries with dementia (mean [SD] age, 85.5 [8.0] years; 3038 women [60.1%]; 809 [16.0%] non-Hispanic Black, 357 [7.1%] Hispanic, and 3892 non-Hispanic White respondents [76.9%]). In adjusted analysis, non-Hispanic Black decedents (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.78), nursing home residents (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93), and survey respondents represented by a proxy (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99) were less likely to use hospice, whereas older decedents (age 75-84 vs 65-74 years: OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.12-1.72; age ≥85 vs 65-74 years: OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.13-1.71), women (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35), and decedents with higher education (high school vs less than high school: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.36; more than high school vs less than high school: OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.54), more severe cognitive impairment (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.02-2.23), and more instrumental activities of daily living limitations (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12) were associated with higher hospice enrollment. A higher proportion of Black and Hispanic decedents with dementia used ED (645 of 809 [79.7%] and 274 of 357 [76.8%] vs 2753 of 3892 [70.7%]; P < .001) and inpatient services (625 of 809 [77.3%] and 275 of 357 [77.0%] vs 2630 of 3892 [67.5%]; P < .001) and incurred roughly 60% higher inpatient expenditures at the end of life compared with White decedents (estimated mean: Black, $23 279; 95% CI, $20 690-$25 868; Hispanic, $23 471; 95% CI, $19 532-$27 410 vs White, $14 609; 95% CI, $13 800-$15 418). A higher proportion of Black and Hispanic than White beneficiaries with dementia who were enrolled in hospice were subsequently admitted to the ED (56 of 309 [18.1%] and 22 of 153 [14.4%] vs 191 of 1967 [9.7%]; P < .001) or hospital (48 of 309 [15.5%] and 17 of 153 [11.1%] vs 119 of 1967 [6.0%]; P < .001) before death. The proportion of dementia beneficiaries completing advance care planning was lower among Black (146 of 704 [20.7%]) and Hispanic (66 of 308 [21.4%]) beneficiaries compared with White beneficiaries (1871 of 3274 [57.1%]). A higher proportion of Black and Hispanic decedents with dementia had written instructions choosing all care possible to prolong life (30 of 144 [20.8%] and 12 of 65 [18.4%] vs 72 of 1852 [3.9%]), whereas a higher proportion of White decedents preferred to limit care in certain situations (1708 of 1840 [92.8%] vs 114 of 141 [80.9%] and 51 of 64 [79.7%]), withhold treatments (1448 of 1799 [80.5%] vs 87 of 140 [62.1%] and 41 of 62 [66.1%]), and forgo extensive life-prolonging measures (1712 of 1838 [93.1%] vs 120 of 138 [87.0%] and 54 of 65 [83.1%]). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study highlight unique end-of-life care utilization and treatment preferences across racial and ethnic groups among patients with dementia. Medicare should consider alternative payment models to promote culturally competent end-of-life care and reduce low-value interventions and costs among the population with dementia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Substantially smaller proportions of Black and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries with dementia were enrolled in hospice in the last six months of life compared with White Medicare beneficiaries with dementia (38% and 43% versus 51%, respectively).
“One group of researchers found substantially smaller proportions of Black and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries with dementia enrolled in hospice in the last six months of life compared with White Medicare beneficiaries with dementia (38% and 43% versus 51%, respectively). 938”
From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [938]
Larger proportions of Black and Hispanic beneficiaries with dementia had at least one emergency department visit (80% and 77% respectively) and at least one hospitalization (77% for both groups) compared with White beneficiaries with dementia (71% and 68% respectively) in the last six months of life.
“Furthermore, larger proportions of Black and Hispanic beneficiaries with dementia had at least one emergency department visit (80% and 77% respectively) and at least one hospitalization (77% for both groups) compared with White beneficiaries with dementia (71% and 68% respectively) in the last six months of life. 938”
From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [938]
The proportion of Black and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries with dementia with advance care planning was less than half that of White beneficiaries.
“One group of researchers found that the proportion of Black and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries with dementia with advance care planning was less than half that of White beneficiaries. 938”
From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [938]
Black and Hispanic beneficiaries were more likely to have an emergency department visit and/or a hospitalization after hospice enrollment.
“Black and Hispanic beneficiaries were also more likely to have an emergency department visit and/or a hospitalization after hospice enrollment.”
From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [938]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 71
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [28]National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division of Behavioral Social Sciences and Education; Committee on the Decadal Survey of Behavioral and Social Science Research on Alzheimer's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease-related Dementias. Reducing the Impact of Dementia in America: A Decadal Survey of the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2021. The National Academies Collection: Reports Funded by National Institutes Of Health. National Academies Press; 2021. 34613684
- Authors
- Lin, P.-J., Zhu, Y., Olchanski, N., Cohen, J. T., Neumann, P. J., Faul, J. D., Fillit, H. M., & Freund, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Tufts Medical Center (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lin, Pei-Jung
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Network Open
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2022-06-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e2216260
- ISSN
- 2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9185179
- OpenAlex
- W4281847916
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 13.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Alzheimer's Association
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation
- Amgen
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Pfizer
- AstraZeneca
- Sanofi
- Gilead Sciences
- Biogen
- Tufts Medical Center
- Sunovion
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- National Pharmaceutical Council
- Arnold Ventures
- Cytokinetics
- Sarepta Therapeutics
- Argenx
- Moderna
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- National Institutes of Health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Genentech
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG060165, U01AG009740)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Keywords
- hospice care, end-of-life care, dementia, racial and ethnic disparities, Medicare beneficiaries, hospitalization, emergency department visits, advance care planning, end-of-life preferences, nursing home residents, proxy respondents, non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanic Americans, older adults, health care costs, age and sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Death, Dementia, Female, Medicare, Hospices, Hospitalization, Humans, United States, Cohort Studies, Hospice Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review