Association of race, ethnicity, and rurality with major leg amputation or death among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with diabetic foot ulcers.
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Patients identifying as Black and those living in rural and disadvantaged neighborhoods are at increased risk of major (above-ankle) leg amputations owing to diabetic foot ulcers. Intersectionality emphasizes that the disparities faced by multiply marginalized people (eg, rural US individuals identifying as Black) are greater than the sum of each individual disparity. Objective: To assess whether intersecting identities of Black race, ethnicity, rural residence, or living in a disadvantaged neighborhood are associated with increased risk in major leg amputation or death among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with diabetic foot ulcers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used 2013-2014 data from the US National Medicare Claims Data Database on all adult Medicare patients hospitalized with a diabetic foot ulcer. Statistical analysis was conducted from August 1 to October 27, 2021. Exposures: Race was categorized using Research Triangle Institute variables. Rurality was assigned using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Residents of disadvantaged neighborhoods comprised those living in neighborhoods at or above the national 80th percentile Area Deprivation Index. Main Outcomes and Measures: Major leg amputation or death during hospitalization or within 30 days of hospital discharge. Logistic regression was used to explore interactions among race, ethnicity, rurality, and neighborhood disadvantage, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and ulcer severity. Results: The cohort included 124 487 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 71.5 (13.0) years, of whom 71 286 (57.3%) were men, 13 100 (10.5%) were rural, and 21 649 (17.4%) identified as Black. Overall, 17.6% of the cohort (n = 21 919), 18.3% of rural patients (2402 of 13 100), and 21.9% of patients identifying as Black (4732 of 21 649) underwent major leg amputation or died. Among 1239 rural patients identifying as Black, this proportion was 28.0% (n = 347). This proportion exceeded the expected excess for rural patients (18.3% - 17.6% = 0.7%) plus those identifying as Black (21.9% - 17.6% = 4.3%) by more than 2-fold (28.0% - 17.6% = 10.4% vs 0.7% + 4.3% = 5.0%). The adjusted predicted probability of major leg amputation or death remained high at 24.7% (95% CI, 22.4%-26.9%), with a significant interaction between race and rurality. Conclusions and Relevance: Rural patients identifying as Black had a more than 10% absolute increased risk of major leg amputation or death compared with the overall cohort. This study suggests that racial and rural disparities interacted, amplifying risk. Findings support using an intersectionality lens to investigate and address disparities in major leg amputation and mortality for patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diabetic foot ulcers disproportionately affect people with lower socioeconomic status and those living in rural areas.
“In addition, diabetic foot ulcers disproportionately affect people with lower socioeconomic status and those living in rural areas.20”
From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
The Introduction and Discussion (pages not provided) address disparities in major leg amputation or death among people already hospitalized with diabetic foot ulcers. A search for ulcer incidence or prevalence by socioeconomic status and rural residence found no passage establishing that these groups are more likely to develop diabetic foot ulcers. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Brennan, M. B., Powell, W. R., Kaiksow, F., Kramer, J., Liu, Y., Kind, A. J. H., & Bartels, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brennan, Meghan B.
- Venue
- JAMA Network Open
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2022-04-21
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e228399
- ISSN
- 2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9024392
- OpenAlex
- W4224227855
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Research to Prevent Blindness
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002373)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08 HS026279)
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG037639, R01AG070883)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK020579)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01MD010243)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
- Keywords
- diabetic foot ulcer, mortality, racial disparities, Black patients, rural residence, neighborhood disadvantage, intersectionality, health disparities, Medicare beneficiaries, hospitalization outcomes, socioeconomic status, ethnic minority patients, health equity, Area Deprivation Index, urban-rural differences, diabetes complications, health care access, quality of care, health care costs, health care utilization
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Amputation, Surgical, Diabetes Mellitus, Ethnicity, Female, Medicare, Hospitalization, Humans, Leg, Male, Retrospective Studies, United States, Diabetic Foot
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review