Treatment Rates for Mental Disorders Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Mental disorders among children and adolescents are global health concerns. Published studies have provided discordant results regarding treatment rates for mental disorders among youths. Objective: To estimate combined treatment rates for several common psychiatric disorders among children and adolescents. Data Sources: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Embase were searched from database inception until September 23, 2022, and supplemented with hand-searching of reference lists. Study Selection: Included studies were those that used validated methods to report treatment rates for any mental disorder, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and behavior disorders among children and adolescents. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and scored quality. Studies with a Joanna Briggs Institute score of 5 or more were included in the meta-analysis. Treatment rates were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the association with treatment rates of factors, such as year of data collection, World Health Organization region, age, income level, timeframe of diagnosis, informant source, service type, sample origin, and internalizing or externalizing disorder. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment rates for mental disorders among children and adolescents were the main outcomes, measured as percentage estimates. Results: Forty studies were included in the analysis, comprising 310 584 children and adolescents, with boys accounting for 39% of participants (sex was not reported in 10 studies). The pooled treatment rate was 38% (95% CI, 30%-45%) for any mental disorder, 36% (95% CI, 29%-43%) for depressive disorders, 31% (95% CI, 21%-42%) for anxiety disorders, 58% (95% CI, 42%-73%) for ADHD, and 49% (95% CI, 35%-64%) for behavior disorders. Age, income level, and region were significantly associated with the combined treatment rates of mental disorders in children and adolescents. The treatment rate for depressive disorders was higher among adolescents than children (36% [95% CI, 25%-46%] vs 11% [95% CI, 0%-25%]), whereas the treatment rate for anxiety disorders was higher among children than adolescents (64% [95% CI, 52%-75%] vs 20% [95% CI, 9%-30%]). The treatment rate for any mental disorder in lower-middle income countries was 6% (95% CI, 2%-14%), in upper-middle income countries was 24% (95% CI, 2%-47%), and in high-income countries was 43% (95% CI, 35%-52%). For depressive disorders, treatment rates were higher in the Americas (40% [95% CI, 30%-51%]) than in Europe (28% [95% CI, 13%-43%]) and the Western Pacific region (6% [95% CI, 1%-16%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that, in general, the treatment rates for mental disorders among children and adolescents were low, especially for depression and anxiety. Targeted intervention policies and effective measures should be designed and implemented to improve treatment rates of psychiatric disorders among youths.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Treatment rates for any mental disorder in adolescents are 38%.
“This results in both low treatment rates of 38% for any mental disorder in this age group [38]”
From Efficacy of a transdiagnostic Internet prevention approach in adolescents (EMPATIA study): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
The Results (Treatment Rates for Mental Disorders) report a pooled 38% treatment rate for any mental disorder among children and adolescents combined. The age subgroup analysis reports no significant difference between children and adolescents, but does not establish 38% as the adolescent-specific rate. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInternet interventions meet adolescents' preference for self-reliance because they can be used at their own pace, at low costs, and independent of time and place.
“Further, Internet interventions meet the preference of adolescents for self-reliance because they can use them at their own pace, at low costs, and independent of time and place [38, 48].”
From Efficacy of a transdiagnostic Internet prevention approach in adolescents (EMPATIA study): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
The Conclusions say telemedicine can reduce treatment barriers, and the Discussion identifies financial and logistical barriers to care for young people. Neither section says that Internet interventions meet adolescents’ preference for self-reliance or that they can be used at one’s own pace, at low cost, and independent of time and place. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 106
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [66]Richmond JB, Kotelchuck M. Political Influences: Rethinking National Health Policy: Handbook of Health Professions Education. Jossey-Bass; 1983: 384- 404.
- Authors
- Wang, S., Li, Q., Lu, J., Ran, H., Che, Y., Fang, D., Liang, X., Sun, H., Chen, L., Peng, J., Shi, Y., & Xiao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Kunming Medical University (CN)
- Psychiatry Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
- Corresponding author
- Xiao, Yuanyuan
- Venue
- JAMA Network Open
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2023-10-18
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e2338174
- ISSN
- 2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10585417
- OpenAlex
- W4387728596
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 13
- FWCI
- 5.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (82360670, 82060601, 72264019)
- Kunming Medical University
- Recruitment Program of Global Experts
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Keywords
- mental disorders in children and adolescents, treatment rates, mental illness, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, behavior disorders, adolescents, children, socioeconomic factors, regional disparities, internalizing disorders, externalizing disorders, help-seeking, access to mental health care, diagnosis timing, WHO regions, income level, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Male, Conduct Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review