Cited by 16Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentHealthcare Policy and ManagementSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Medicaid Unwinding and Changes in Buprenorphine Dispensing

Open access

Abstract

Importance: After the Medicaid continuous enrollment provision ended on March 31, 2023, millions of Medicaid patients were disenrolled, a process called “Medicaid unwinding.” Whether this process was associated with changes in dispensing of buprenorphine, a medication for opioid use disorder preventing opioid overdose deaths, is unknown. Objective: To evaluate changes in buprenorphine dispensing during Medicaid unwinding. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used difference-in-differences analysis to assess data from the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription Database, capturing 92% of US retail prescriptions. Treatment and comparison states were those in the top vs bottom quartile of the percentage change in adult Medicaid enrollment between the month before the state resumed Medicaid eligibility determinations and December 31, 2023. Analyses included Medicaid-insured adults with active buprenorphine prescriptions in quarter 1 from 2017 to 2023. Exposure: State-level change in adult Medicaid enrollment. The preexposure period was from July 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022, and the postexposure period was from July 1 to December 31, 2023 (quarters 3 and 4). Main Outcomes and Measures: Four outcomes assessed buprenorphine dispensing in quarters 3 and 4 from 2017 to 2023: the number of days with active buprenorphine prescriptions, no active prescriptions, 1 or more active prescriptions paid with private insurance, and 1 or more active cash-pay prescriptions. Linear and logistic regression models compared changes in outcomes over time among treatment and comparison states. Results: Analyses included 754 675 person-years from 569 069 patients (mean [SD] age, 39.2 [9.6] years; 386 719 men [51.2%]). Among adults in treatment states, the number of days with active buprenorphine prescriptions in quarters 3 and 4 decreased by 3.9 days (95% CI, −6.7 to −1.1 days) more compared with adults in comparison states. Adults in treatment states also had an increase of 1.8 percentage points (95% CI, 0.6-3.0 percentage points) in the probability of having no days with active prescriptions, an increase of 1.9 percentage points (95% CI, 0.4-3.4 percentage points) in the probability of having 1 or more active prescriptions paid with private insurance, and an increase of 0.9 percentage points (95% CI, 0.1-1.7 percentage points) in the probability of having 1 or more active cash-pay prescriptions. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study using difference-in-differences analysis, Medicaid patients in states with the highest vs lowest magnitude of Medicaid disenrollment through December 2023 were more likely to decrease or discontinue buprenorphine use and more likely to transition to private insurance or cash to pay for prescriptions. Findings suggest that Medicaid unwinding was associated with disruptions in buprenorphine therapy, raising concerns about the potential for increased opioid-related morbidity and mortality among patients in this population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8469

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that 43.0% of SUD service utilizations were self-pay is consistent with documented barriers to SUD treatment, including lack of insurance, inadequate coverage benefits, cash-only payment acceptance, and patients' self-pay preference due to stigma-related privacy concerns.

    “our finding that 43.0% of SUD service utilizations were self-pay is consistent with documented barriers to SUD treatment, including lack of insurance,24 inadequate coverage benefits across various insurance types,24, 31-36 cash-only payment acceptance (i.e., non-acceptance of any insurance) by SUD treatment providers,36 and patients’ self-pay preference due to stigma-related privacy concerns.24”

    From County-Level Variation in Substance Use Disorder Service Utilization by Insurance Payers and Self-Pay in the United States (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Gertner, 2022, A mixed methods study of provider factors in buprenorphine treatment retention., Int J Drug Policy, 105, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103715 · DOI
  2. Williams, 2024, Defining discontinuation for buprenorphine treatment: implications for quality measurement., Am J Psychiatry, 181, 457, 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230808 · DOI
  3. Carlson, 2006, Short-term impacts of coverage loss in a Medicaid population: early results from a prospective cohort study of the Oregon Health Plan., Ann Fam Med, 4, 391, 10.1370/afm.573 · DOI
  4. Mojtabai, 2019, Insurance loss in the era of the Affordable Care Act: association with access to health services., Med Care, 57, 567, 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001150 · DOI
  5. Roberts, 2023, Racial and ethnic disparities in health care use and access associated with loss of Medicaid supplemental insurance eligibility above the federal poverty level., JAMA Intern Med, 183, 534, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0512 · DOI
  6. Sommers, 2009, Loss of health insurance among non-elderly adults in Medicaid., J Gen Intern Med, 24, 1, 10.1007/s11606-008-0792-9 · DOI
  7. Chua, 2024, Buprenorphine dispensing after elimination of the waiver requirement., N Engl J Med, 390, 1530, 10.1056/NEJMc2312906 · DOI
  8. Chua, 2023, Trends in buprenorphine initiation and retention in the United States, 2016-2022., JAMA, 329, 1402, 10.1001/jama.2023.1207 · DOI
  9. Bentzley, 2015, Discontinuation of buprenorphine maintenance therapy: perspectives and outcomes., J Subst Abuse Treat, 52, 48, 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.12.011 · DOI · Paper page
  10. McIntyre, 2024, Coverage and access changes during Medicaid unwinding., JAMA Health Forum, 5, 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2193 · DOI
  11. Chua, 2024, Association between cost-sharing and buprenorphine prescription abandonment., J Gen Intern Med, 39, 2160, 10.1007/s11606-024-08819-2 · DOI
  12. Bilden, 2024, Examining the impact of eliminating the X waiver on buprenorphine dispensation in 63 counties in Pennsylvania., Subst Use Addctn J, 15, 10.1177/29767342241303583 · DOI
  13. StataCorp, 2023, Stata Statistical Software: Release 18
  14. Leshner? AI, Mancher? M, eds. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives. The National Academies Press; 2019. Accessed April 22, 2024. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25310/medications-for-opioid-use-disorder-save-lives · DOI
  15. Indivior announces launch of SUBOXONE (buprenorphine and naloxone) sublingual film authorized generic. Indivior PLC. February 20, 2019. Accessed June 1, 2024. https://www.indivior.com/en/media/press-releases/indivior-announces-launch-of-suboxone
  16. DeLeire? T. The effect of disenrollment from Medicaid on employment, insurance coverage, and health and health care utilization. National Bureau of Economic Research. August 2018. Accessed May 1, 2024. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24899 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Constantin, J., Kenney, G. M., Simon, K., & Chua, K.-P.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Urban Institute (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Constantin, Joanne
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2025-05-02
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
e258469
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410019797
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6
FWCI
14.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Justice
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA057284, R01DA057943, R01DA056438)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
opioid use disorder, Medicaid disenrollment, opioid overdose prevention, prescription drug access, private insurance coverage, prescription drug monitoring programs
MeSH terms
Adult, Buprenorphine, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Medicaid, Middle Aged, Opioid-Related Disorders, Drug Prescriptions, United States, Opiate Substitution Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review