The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seroprevalence of Aquaporin-4–IgG in a Northern California Population Representative Cohort of Multiple Sclerosis
Abstract
Importance Using an aquaporin-4 (AQP4) M1-isoform-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a fixed transfected cell-based assay (CBA), we tested AQP4-IgG in a northern California population representative cohort of 3293 potential cases with multiple sclerosis (MS). Seropositive cases were tested additionally by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, a live transfected cell-based assay. Observations Sera samples were available in 1040 cases; 7 yielded positive results, 4 by ELISA alone and 3 by both ELISA and CBA. Clinical data (episodes of optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis [reported on at least 1 magnetic resonance imaging spine]) supported the alternative diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica for 2 patients as seropositive by both ELISA and CBA. These 2 patients alone tested positive by a fluorescence-activated cell-sorting assay. The diagnosis of MS was considered correct in the other 5 patients. Thus, 5 ELISA results and 1 fixed CBA result were false positive. Conclusions and relevance Sensitive serological evaluation for AQP4-IgG in this large population-representative cohort of predominantly white non-Hispanic patients with MS reveals that neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder is rarely misdiagnosed as MS in contemporary US neurological practice (0.2%). The frequency of a false-positive result for ELISA and CBA in this MS cohort were 0.5% and 0.1%, respectively. This finding reflects the superior specificity of CBA and justifies cau…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Approximately 70% of patients with relapsing NMOSD are AQP4-IgG positive, with the sensitivity increased with the use of cell-based rather than ELISA assays.
“Approximately 70% of patients with relapsing NMOSD are AQP4-IgG positive, with the sensitivity increased with the use of cell-based rather than ELISA assays.53,54”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [54]
AQP4-IgG is highly specific for NMOSD, although false positives occur in up to 0.5% of MS patients using ELISA assays, potentially resulting in misdiagnosis.
“AQP4-IgG is highly specific for NMOSD, although false positives occur in up to 0.5% of MS patients using ELISA assays, potentially resulting in misdiagnosis.54,55”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [54]
Citations
Cites
Serologic diagnosis of NMO: A multicenter comparison of aquaporin-4-IgG assays
Waters, P. J., McKeon, A., Leite, M. I., Rajasekharan, S., Lennon, V. A., Villalobos, A., Palace, J., Mandrekar, J. N., Vincent, A., Bar-Or, A., et al. (2012) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e318248dec1 · Cited by 526
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701
Metadata
- Authors
- Pittock, S. J., Lennon, V. A., Bakshi, N., Shen, L., McKeon, A., Quach, H., Briggs, F. B. S., Bernstein, A. L., Schaefer, C. A., & Barcellos, L. F.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Palms of Pasadena Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pittock, Sean J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2014-11-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1433
- ISSN
- 2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988435452
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI076544)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS065829, R01NS049510, R01NS065829)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES017080)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- aquaporin-4 antibodies, multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, seroprevalence, false-positive serology, cell-based assays, ELISA, diagnostic specificity, misdiagnosis, longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis, optic neuritis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Autoantibodies, California, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelitis, Transverse, Optic Neuritis, Cohort Studies, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Aquaporin 4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review