The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Apolipoprotein E and Neurocognitive Function—Reply
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite the normal biomarkers, the cognitive impairment and relatively young age make this case ultimately uninformative on the question of whether reducing apoE might be beneficial or detrimental in terms of AD pathogenesis.”
From APOE loss-of-function variants: Compatible with longevity and associated with resistance to Alzheimer’s disease pathology (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Mak, A. C. Y., Pullinger, C. R., Tang, L. F., Wong, J. S., Deo, R. C., Schwarz, J.-M., Gugliucci, A., Movsesyan, I., Ishida, B. Y., Chu, C., et al. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.2011 · Cited by 94
Self-citation
Cited by
A Quarter Century of APOE and Alzheimer’s Disease: Progress to Date and the Path Forward
Belloy, M. E., Napolioni, V., & Greicius, M. D. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.056 · Cited by 570
Chemparathy, A., Le Guen, Y., Chen, S., Lee, E.-G., Leong, L., Gorzynski, J. E., Jensen, T. D., Ferrasse, A., Xu, G., Xiang, H., et al. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.01.008 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Malloy, M., Miller, B., & Kane, J.
- Affiliations
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco
- Neurology/Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco
- Venue
- JAMA Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-04-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 479
- ISSN
- 2168-6149
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Apolipoprotein E and Neurocognitive Function—Reply. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4699
- The paper
- Malloy, M., Miller, B., & Kane, J. (2015). Apolipoprotein E and Neurocognitive Function—Reply. JAMA Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
