It’s time to rebrand “Mommy brain”
Open accessAbstract
This Viewpoint discusses the concept of “mommy brain” and why it needs to change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the appendix of Cox's ten updated recommendations for the optimal administration of the EPDS are instructions on how to thoroughly ask and listen to answers.
“Interestingly, in the appendix of Cox’s ten updated recommendations for the optimal administration of the EPDS are instructions on how to thoroughly ask and listen to answers:”
From A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The concept of 'baby brain' is derogatory and mistakenly associated with cognitive decline.
“This challenges the derogatory concept of 'baby brain,' mistakenly associated with cognitive decline (25).”
From A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
Less can be more: Fine tuning the maternal brain
Pawluski, J. L., Hoekzema, E., Leuner, B., & Lonstein, J. S. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.11.045 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry
Athan, A. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1364845 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCormack, C., Callaghan, B. L., & Pawluski, J. L.
- Affiliations
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Inserm (FR)
- Venue
- JAMA Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2023-04-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 335
- ISSN
- 2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4319294932
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
- Keywords
- rebranding, maternal health
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Head, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
