Cited by 289Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersPolyomavirus and related diseases

Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Compared With Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker for Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis

Open access
Meier, Stephanie, Willemse, Eline A.J., Schaedelin, Sabine, Oechtering, Johanna, Lorscheider, Johannes, Melie-Garcia, Lester, Cagol, Alessandro, Barakovic, Muhamed +33 more·2023·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

Importance: There is a lack of validated biomarkers for disability progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: To determine how serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) and serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) correlate with features of disease progression vs acute focal inflammation in MS and how they can prognosticate disease progression. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were acquired in the longitudinal Swiss MS cohort (SMSC; a consortium of tertiary referral hospitals) from January 1, 2012, to October 20, 2022. The SMSC is a prospective, multicenter study performed in 8 centers in Switzerland. For this nested study, participants had to meet the following inclusion criteria: cohort 1, patients with MS and either stable or worsening disability and similar baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale scores with no relapses during the entire follow-up; and cohort 2, all SMSC study patients who had initiated and continued B-cell–depleting treatment (ie, ocrelizumab or rituximab). Exposures: Patients received standard immunotherapies or were untreated. Main Outcomes and Measures: In cohort 1, sGFAP and sNfL levels were measured longitudinally using Simoa assays. Healthy control samples served as the reference. In cohort 2, sGFAP and sNfL levels were determined cross-sectionally. Results: This study included a total of 355 patients (103 [29.0%] in cohort 1: median [IQR] age, 42.1 [33.2-47.6] years; 73 female patients [70.9%]; and 252 [71.0%] in cohort 2: median [IQR] age, 44.3 [33.3-54.7] years; 156 female patients [61.9%]) and 259 healthy controls with a median [IQR] age of 44.3 [36.3-52.3] years and 177 female individuals (68.3%). sGFAP levels in controls increased as a function of age (1.5% per year; P < .001), were inversely correlated with BMI (−1.1% per BMI unit; P = .01), and were 14.9% higher in women than in men ( P = .004). In cohort 1, patients with worsening progressive MS showed 50.9% higher sGFAP levels compared with those with stable MS after additional sNfL adjustment, whereas the 25% increase of sNfL disappeared after additional sGFAP adjustment. Higher sGFAP at baseline was associated with accelerated gray matter brain volume loss (per doubling: 0.24% per year; P < .001) but not white matter loss. sGFAP levels remained unchanged during disease exacerbations vs remission phases. In cohort 2, median (IQR) sGFAP z scores were higher in patients developing future confirmed disability worsening compared with those with stable disability (1.94 [0.36-2.23] vs 0.71 [−0.13 to 1.73]; P = .002); this was not significant for sNfL. However, the combined elevation of z scores of both biomarkers resulted in a 4- to 5-fold increased risk of confirmed disability worsening (hazard ratio [HR], 4.09; 95% CI, 2.04-8.18; P < .001) and PIRA (HR, 4.71; 95% CI, 2.05-9.77; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that sGFAP is a prognostic biomarker for future PIRA and revealed its complementary potential next to sNfL. sGFAP may serve as a useful biomarker for disease progression in MS in individual patient management and drug development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.5250

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GFAP elevations have been reported in frontotemporal dementia, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis and inflammatory central nervous system diseases.

    “For example, GFAP elevations have been reported in frontotemporal dementia39, traumatic brain injury40, multiple sclerosis41 and inflammatory central nervous system diseases42.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meier, S., Willemse, E. A. J., Schaedelin, S., Oechtering, J., Lorscheider, J., Melie-Garcia, L., Cagol, A., Barakovic, M., Galbusera, R., Subramaniam, S., Barro, C., Abdelhak, A., Thebault, S., Achtnichts, L., Lalive, P., Müller, S., Pot, C., Salmen, A., Disanto, G., Zecca, C., D’Souza, M., Orleth, A., Khalil, M., Buchmann, A., Du Pasquier, R., Yaldizli, Ö., Derfuss, T., Berger, K., Hermesdorf, M., Wiendl, H., Piehl, F., Battaglini, M., Fischer, U., Kappos, L., Gobbi, C., Granziera, C., Bridel, C., Leppert, D., Maleska Maceski, A., Benkert, P., & Kuhle, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Kantonsspital Aarau (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Kantonsspital St. Gallen (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • University Hospital Münster (DE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Siena (IT)
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2023-03-01
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
287
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319294374
Cited by
289
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 26
FWCI
57.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Biogen
  • Celgene
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of Bern
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
  • Università degli Studi di Siena
  • International Progressive MS Alliance
  • Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
  • Université de Lausanne
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
  • Medizinische Universität Graz
  • Faculté de Médecine, Université de Genève
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light chain, serum biomarkers, disability progression, B-cell depletion therapy, ocrelizumab, rituximab, focal inflammation, disease-modifying therapy, prognostic factors, sex differences, Simoa assay, longitudinal cohort
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Intermediate Filaments, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Neurofilament Proteins, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review