Exploratory Tau Biomarker Results From a Multiple Ascending-Dose Study of BIIB080 in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Accumulation of hyperphosphorylated, tangled microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) is a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD) associated with disease progression and cognitive decline. Objective: To evaluate the effect of tau synthesis reduction on tau biomarkers in patients with mild AD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled 36-week multiple-ascending dose (MAD) phase 1b trial (October 2017 to September 2020), followed by a 64- or 71-week open-label long-term extension (LTE) (October 2019 to May 2022). After being assessed for eligibility at 12 sites in Canada and Europe, participants with mild AD and confirmed amyloid pathology were randomized 3:1 (BIIB080:placebo) in 4 dose cohorts. Intervention: Intrathecal administration of BIIB080, a MAPT -targeting antisense oligonucleotide, or placebo. Active dose arms included 10 mg every 4 weeks, 30 mg every 4 weeks, 60 mg every 4 weeks, and 115 mg every 12 weeks during the MAD period and 60 mg every 12 weeks or 115 mg every 12 weeks during the LTE. Main Outcome and Measures: The original primary end point was safety. Additionally, BIIB080, total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations were evaluated. Tau positron emission tomography (PET) was collected in a substudy, and standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were calculated in a priori-defined composite regions of interest. Results: Of 102 participants assessed for eligibility, 46 participants with mild AD were enrolled; 23 (50%) were female, and mean (SD) age was 65.8 (5.70) years. BIIB080 was generally well tolerated and was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in CSF t-tau and p-tau181 in the MAD period (56% reduction; 95% CI, 50% to 62%; and 51% reduction; 95% CI, 38% to 63%, of CSF t-tau in the 2 higher-dose cohorts) that continued and/or was maintained through quarterly dosing in the LTE. Tau PET demonstrated reduced accumulation vs placebo at week 25 (n = 13). At week 100, tau PET showed a reduction from baseline across all regions assessed (n = 12), with the largest reductions from baseline observed in the temporal composite (−0.71 SUVR; 95% CI, −1.40 to −0.02). A moderate correlation was observed between model-predicted cumulative CSF drug exposure and tau PET change. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, BIIB080 reduced tau biomarkers, including CSF t-tau, CSF p-tau181, and tau PET, which is associated with cognitive decline, in participants with mild AD. Effects of BIIB080 on biomarkers and clinical outcomes are being further evaluated in a phase 2 trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03186989
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537 · see citing works
Self-citationThe neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
DeTure, M. A., & Dickson, D. W. (2019) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-019-0333-5 · Cited by 3,329 · see citing works
Nelson, P. T., Alafuzoff, I., Bigio, E. H., Bouras, C., Braak, H., Cairns, N. J., Castellani, R. J., Crain, B. J., Davies, P., Tredici, K. D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e31825018f7 · Cited by 2,050 · see citing works
Donanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease
Mintun, M. A., Lo, A. C., Duggan Evans, C., Wessels, A. M., Ardayfio, P. A., Andersen, S. W., Shcherbinin, S., Sparks, J., Sims, J. R., Brys, M., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2100708 · Cited by 1,728 · see citing works
DeVos, S. L., Miller, R. L., Schoch, K. M., Holmes, B. B., Kebodeaux, C. S., Wegener, A. J., Chen, G., Shen, T., Tran, H., Nichols, B., et al. (2017) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aag0481 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Self-citationLongitudinal tau PET in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease
Jack, C. R., Wiste, H. J., Schwarz, C. G., Lowe, V. J., Senjem, M. L., Vemuri, P., Weigand, S. D., Therneau, T. M., Knopman, D. S., Gunter, J. L., et al. (2018) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awy059 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Pontecorvo, M. J., Lu, M., Burnham, S. C., Schade, A. E., Dage, J. L., Shcherbinin, S., Collins, E. C., Sims, J. R., & Mintun, M. A. (2022) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3392 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Progressive Tau Accumulation in Alzheimer Disease: 2-Year Follow-up Study
Cho, H., Choi, J. Y., Lee, H. S., Lee, J. H., Ryu, Y. H., Lee, M. S., Jack, C. R., & Lyoo, C. H. (2019) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.221697 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tau Ablation Rewires Brain Cell Programs in Health and Restores Function in Disease
Chimal-Juárez, E., Patel, H., Jury-Garfe, N., Dabin, L. C., Vidal, R., Kim, J., & Lasagna-Reeves, C. A. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.05.12.724684
- Authors
- Edwards, A. L., Collins, J. A., Junge, C., Kordasiewicz, H., Mignon, L., Wu, S., Li, Y., Lin, L., DuBois, J., Hutchison, R. M., Ziogas, N., Shulman, M., Martarello, L., Graham, D., Lane, R., Budd Haeberlein, S., & Beaver, J.
- Affiliations
- Biogen (United States) (US)
- Ionis Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
- Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Corresponding author
- Edwards, Amanda L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2023-12-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1344
- ISSN
- 2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10616768
- OpenAlex
- W4388014241
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 24
- FWCI
- 19.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, antisense oligonucleotides, tau protein, tau PET, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, phosphorylated tau 181, total tau, intrathecal drug delivery, amyloid pathology, mild Alzheimer disease, drug safety, long-term extension study, cognitive decline prevention, neurodegeneration biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review