Cited by 69Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Sex differences in longitudinal tau-PET in preclinical Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis

Open access
Coughlan, Gillian T., Klinger, Hannah M., Boyle, Rory, Betthauser, Tobey J., Binette, Alexa Pichet, Christenson, Luke, Chadwick, Trevor, Hansson, Oskar +34 more·2025·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

Importance: Alzheimer disease (AD) predominates in females at almost twice the rate relative to males. Mounting evidence in adults without AD indicates that females exhibit higher tau deposition than age-matched males, particularly in the setting of elevated β-amyloid (Aβ), but the evidence for sex differences in tau accumulation rates is inconclusive. Objective: To examine whether female sex is associated with faster tau accumulation in the setting of high Aβ (as measured with positron emission tomography [PET]) and the moderating influence of sex on the association between APOE ε4 carrier status and tau accumulation. Data Sources: This meta-analysis used data from 6 longitudinal aging and AD studies, including the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Berkeley Aging Cohort Study, BioFINDER 1, Harvard Aging Brain Study, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, and Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer Prevention. Longitudinal data were collected between November 2004 and May 2022. Study Selection: Included studies required available longitudinal [ 18 F]flortaucipir or [ 18 F]-MK-6240 tau-PET scans, as well as baseline [ 11 C] Pittsburgh Compound B, [ 18 F]flutemetamol or [ 18 F]florbetapir Aβ-PET scans. Recruitment criteria varied across studies. Analyses began on August 7, 2023, and were completed on February 5, 2024. Data Extraction and Synthesis: In each study, primary analyses extracted estimates for the sex (female or male) and the sex by baseline Aβ-PET status (high or low) association with longitudinal tau-PET using a series of mixed-effects models. Secondary mixed-effects models extracted the interaction estimate for the association of sex by APOE ε4 carrier status with longitudinal tau-PET. Study-specific estimates for each mixed-effects model were then pooled in a meta-analysis, and the global fixed effect (β) and total heterogeneity ( I 2 ) across studies were estimated. This study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Seven tau-PET outcomes that showed cross-sectional sex differences were examined across temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes. Results: Among 6 studies assessed, there were 1376 participants (761 [55%] female; mean [range] age at first tau scan, 71.9 [46-93] years; 401 participants [29%] with high baseline Aβ; 412 APOE ε4 carriers [30%]). Among individuals with high baseline Aβ, female sex was associated with faster tau accumulation localized to inferior temporal (β = −0.14; 95% CI, −0.22 to −0.06; P = .009) temporal fusiform (β = −0.13; 95% CI, −0.23 to −0.04; P = .02), and lateral occipital regions (β = −0.15; 95% CI, −0.24 to −0.06; P = .009) compared with male sex. Among APOE ε4 carriers, female sex was associated with faster inferior-temporal tau accumulation (β = −0.10; 95% CI, −0.16 to −0.03; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that sex differences in the pathological progression of AD call for sex-specific timing considerations when administrating anti-Aβ and anti-tau treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0013

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coughlan, G. T., Klinger, H. M., Boyle, R., Betthauser, T. J., Binette, A. P., Christenson, L., Chadwick, T., Hansson, O., Harrison, T. M., Healy, B., Jacobs, H. I. L., Hanseeuw, B., Jonaitis, E., Jack, C. R., Johnson, K. A., Langhough, R. E., Properzi, M. J., Rentz, D. M., Schultz, A. P., Smith, R., Seto, M., Johnson, S. C., Mielke, M. M., Shirzadi, Z., Yau, W.-Y. W., Manson, J. E., Sperling, R. A., Vemuri, P., Buckley, R. F., Initiative, A. D. N., Hurko, O., Black, S. E., Doody, R., Doraiswamy, M., Gamst, A., Kaye, J., Obisesan, T., Rusinek, H., Scharre, D., Sperling, R., Weiner, M. W., & Green., R. C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
  • Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (US)
  • for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2025-04-01
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
364
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408091426
Cited by
69
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 23
FWCI
40.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R21AG074220, R01AG062559, R01AG082006, K01AG078443, R01AG056366, P30AG066518, P01AG036694, K99AG083063, R01AG068062, K23AG084868)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
sex differences, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, tau accumulation, amyloid-beta, APOE ε4, 18F-flortaucipir, [18F]MK-6240, 11C-Pittsburgh compound B, temporal lobe, parietal lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review