The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 and Efficacy of Taxane Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: We previously showed that detection of androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) was associated with primary resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone therapy, but the relevance of AR-V7 status in the context of chemotherapy is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether AR-V7-positive patients would retain sensitivity to taxane chemotherapy and whether AR-V7 status would have a differential impact on taxane-treated men compared with enzalutamide- or abiraterone-treated men. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We examined CTCs for AR-V7 mRNA using a reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay. From January 2013 to July 2014, we prospectively enrolled patients with metastatic CRPC initiating taxane chemotherapy (docetaxel or cabazitaxel) at a single academic institution (Johns Hopkins). Our prespecified statistical plan required a sample size of 36 taxane-treated men. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We evaluated associations between AR-V7 status and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates, PSA progression-free survival (PSA PFS), and clinical and/or radiographic progression-free survival (PFS). After incorporating updated data from our prior study of 62 patients treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone, we also investigated the interaction between AR-V7 status (positive or negative) and treatment type (taxane vs enzalutamide or abiraterone). RESULTS: Of 37 taxane-treated patients enrolled, 17 (46%) had detectable AR-V7 in CTCs. Prostate-specific antigen responses were achieved in both AR-V7-positive and AR-V7-negative men (41% vs 65%; P = .19). Similarly, PSA PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7, 95% CI, 0.6-5.0; P = .32) and PFS (HR, 2.7, 95% CI, 0.8-8.8; P = .11) were comparable in AR-V7-positive and AR-V7-negative patients. A significant interaction was observed between AR-V7 status and treatment type (P < .001). Clinical outcomes were superior with taxanes compared with enzalutamide or abiraterone therapy in AR-V7-positive men, whereas outcomes did not differ by treatment type in AR-V7-negative men. In AR-V7-positive patients, PSA responses were higher in taxane-treated vs enzalutamide- or abiraterone-treated men (41% vs 0%; P < .001), and PSA PFS and PFS were significantly longer in taxane-treated men (HR, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.07-0.52] for PSA PFS, P = .001; HR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.07-0.59] for PFS, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Detection of AR-V7 in CTCs from men with metastatic CRPC is not associated with primary resistance to taxane chemotherapy. In AR-V7-positive men, taxanes appear to be more efficacious than enzalutamide or abiraterone therapy, whereas in AR-V7-negative men, taxanes and enzalutamide or abiraterone may have comparable efficacy. Circulating tumor cell-based AR-V7 detection may serve as a treatment selection biomarker in CRPC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Docetaxel plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer
Tannock, I. F., de Wit, R., Berry, W. R., Horti, J., Pluzanska, A., Chi, K. N., Oudard, S., Théodore, C., James, N. D., Turesson, I., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040720 · Cited by 5,735
Self-citationSipuleucel-T Immunotherapy for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Kantoff, P. W., Higano, C. S., Shore, N. D., Berger, E. R., Small, E. J., Penson, D. F., Redfern, C. H., Ferrari, A. C., Dreicer, R., Sims, R. B., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1001294 · Cited by 5,572
Abiraterone and Increased Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
de Bono, J. S., Logothetis, C. J., Molina, A., Fizazi, K., North, S., Chu, L., Chi, K. N., Jones, R. J., Goodman, O. B., Saad, F., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1014618 · Cited by 4,407
Alpha Emitter Radium-223 and Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Parker, C., Nilsson, S., Heinrich, D., Helle, S. I., O'Sullivan, J. M., Fosså, S. D., Chodacki, A., Wiechno, P., Logue, J., Seke, M., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1213755 · Cited by 3,408
AR-V7 and Resistance to Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in Prostate Cancer
Antonarakis, E. S., Lu, C., Wang, H., Luber, B., Nakazawa, M., Roeser, J. C., Chen, Y., Mohammad, T. A., Chen, Y., Fedor, H. L., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1315815 · Cited by 2,710
Self-citationTubulin-Targeting Chemotherapy Impairs Androgen Receptor Activity in Prostate Cancer
Zhu, M.-L., Horbinski, C. M., Garzotto, M., Qian, D. Z., Beer, T. M., & Kyprianou, N. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0585 · Cited by 352
Cited by
Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA as Liquid Biopsy
Alix-Panabières, C., & Pantel, K. (2016) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-1483 · Cited by 1,394
Liquid biopsy and minimal residual disease - latest advances and implications for cure
Pantel, K., & Alix-Panabières, C. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0187-3 · Cited by 1,110
Exosome-based liquid biopsies in cancer: opportunities and challenges
Yu, W., Hurley, J., Roberts, D., Chakrabortty, S. K., Enderle, D., Noerholm, M., Breakefield, X. O., & Skog, J. K. (2021) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.01.074 · Cited by 870
Scher, H. I., Lu, D., Schreiber, N. A., Louw, J., Graf, R. P., Vargas, H. A., Johnson, A., Jendrisak, A., Bambury, R., Danila, D., et al. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1828 · Cited by 641
Sartor, O., & de Bono, J. S. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1701695 · Cited by 546
Metadata
- Authors
- Antonarakis, E. S., Lu, C., Luber, B., Wang, H., Chen, Y., Nakazawa, M., Nadal, R., Paller, C. J., Denmeade, S. R., Carducci, M. A., Eisenberger, M. A., & Luo, J.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-08-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 582
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1844925317
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 72.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 and Efficacy of Taxane Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1341
- The paper
- Antonarakis, E. S., Lu, C., Luber, B., Wang, H., Chen, Y., Nakazawa, M., Nadal, R., Paller, C. J., Denmeade, S. R., Carducci, M. A., Eisenberger, M. A., & Luo, J. (2015). Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 and Efficacy of Taxane Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.