Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 659

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimating Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: An Update of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA)

Open access
Sperduto, Paul W., Yang, T. Jonathan, Beal, Kathryn, Pan, Hubert, Brown, Paul D., Bangdiwala, Ananta, Shanley, Ryan, Yeh, Norman, Gaspar, Laurie E., Braunstein, Steve, Sneed, Penny, Boyle, John, Kirkpatrick, John P., Mak, Kimberley S., Shih, Helen A., Engelman, Alex, Roberge, David, Arvold, Nils D., Alexander, Brian, Awad, Mark M., Contessa, Joseph, Chiang, Veronica, Hardie, John, Ma, Daniel, Lou, Emil, Sperduto, William, Mehta, Minesh P.·2017·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States and worldwide. As systemic therapies improve, patients with lung cancer live longer and thus are at increased risk for brain metastases. Understanding how prognosis varies across this heterogeneous patient population is essential to individualize care and design future clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To update the current Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. The DS-GPA is based on data from patients diagnosed between 1985 and 2005, and we set out to update it by incorporating more recently reported gene and molecular alteration data for patients with NSCLC and brain metastases. This new index is called the Lung-molGPA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a multi-institutional retrospective database analysis of 2186 patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2014 with NSCLC and newly diagnosed brain metastases. The multivariable analyses took place between December 2015 and May 2016, and all prognostic factors were weighted for significance by hazard ratios. Significant factors were included in the updated Lung-molGPA prognostic index. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was survival. Multiple Cox regression was used to select and weight prognostic factors in proportion to their hazard ratios. Log rank tests were used to compare adjacent classes and to compare overall survival for adenocarcinoma vs nonadenocarcinoma groups. RESULTS: The original DS-GPA was based on 4 factors found in 1833 patients with NSCLC and brain metastases diagnosed between 1985 and 2005: patient age, Karnofsky Performance Status, extracranial metastases, and number of brain metastases. The patients studied for the creation of the DS-GPA had a median survival of 7 months from the time of initial treatment of brain metastases. To design the updated Lung-molGPA, we analyzed data from 2186 patients from 2006 through 2014 with NSCLC and newly diagnosed brain metastases (1521 adenocarcinoma and 665 nonadenocarcinoma). Significant prognostic factors included the original 4 factors used in the DS-GPA index plus 2 new factors: EGFR and ALK alterations in patients with adenocarcinoma (mutation status was not routinely tested for nonadenocarcinoma). The overall median survival for the cohort in the present study was 12 months, and those with NSCLC-adenocarcinoma and Lung-molGPA scores of 3.5 to 4.0 had a median survival of nearly 4 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In recent years, patient survival and physicians' ability to predict survival in NSCLC with brain metastases has improved significantly. The updated Lung-molGPA incorporating gene alteration data into the DS-GPA is a user-friendly tool that may facilitate clinical decision making and appropriate stratification of future clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3834

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 659

Metadata

Authors
Sperduto, P. W., Yang, T. J., Beal, K., Pan, H., Brown, P. D., Bangdiwala, A., Shanley, R., Yeh, N., Gaspar, L. E., Braunstein, S., Sneed, P., Boyle, J., Kirkpatrick, J. P., Mak, K. S., Shih, H. A., Engelman, A., Roberge, D., Arvold, N. D., Alexander, B., Awad, M. M., Contessa, J., Chiang, V., Hardie, J., Ma, D., Lou, E., Sperduto, W., & Mehta, M. P.
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
827
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2555516405
Cited by
659
References
18
FWCI
45.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: An Update of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3834
The paper
Sperduto, P. W., Yang, T. J., Beal, K., Pan, H., Brown, P. D., Bangdiwala, A., Shanley, R., Yeh, N., Gaspar, L. E., Braunstein, S., Sneed, P., Boyle, J., Kirkpatrick, J. P., Mak, K. S., Shih, H. A., Engelman, A., Roberge, D., Arvold, N. D., Alexander, B., . . . Mehta, M. P. (2017). Estimating Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: An Update of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA). JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3834

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.