The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of a Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplant
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Several factors are associated with increased hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT), but no reliable risk score has been established to determine the individual risk for HCC recurrence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and validate a Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score for patients with HCC meeting Milan criteria by imaging. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Predictors of recurrence were tested in a development cohort of 721 patients who underwent LT between 2002 and 2012 at 3 academic transplant centers (University of California-San Francisco; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; and Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville) to create the RETREAT score. This was subsequently validated in a cohort of 341 patients also meeting Milan criteria by imaging who underwent LT at the University of Toronto transplant center using the C concordance statistic and net reclassification index. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Characteristics associated with post-LT HCC recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 1061 patients participated in the study; 77.8% (825) were men, and the median (IQR) age was 58.2 (53.3-63.9) years in the development cohort and 56.4 (51.7-61.0) years in the validation cohort (P < .001). In the development cohort of 721 patients (542 men), median α-fetoprotein (AFP) level at the time of LT was 8.3 ng/mL; 9.4% had microvascular invasion (n = 68), and 22.1% were beyond Milan criteria on explant (n = 159) owing to understaging by pretransplantation imaging. Cumulative probabilities of HCC recurrence at 1 and 5 years were 5.7% and 12.8%, respectively. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, 3 variables were independently associated with HCC recurrence: microvascular invasion, AFP at time of LT, and the sum of the largest viable tumor diameter and number of viable tumors on explant. The RETREAT score was created using these 3 variables, with scores ranging from 0 to 5 or higher that were highly predictive of HCC recurrence (C statistic, 0.77). RETREAT was able to stratify 5-year post-LT recurrence risk ranging from less than 3% with a score of 0 to greater than 75% with a score of 5 or higher. The validation cohort (n = 340; 283 men) had significantly higher microvascular invasion (23.8% [n = 81], P < .001), explant beyond Milan criteria (37.3% [n = 159], P < .001), and HCC recurrence at 5 years (17.9% [n = 159], P = .03). RETREAT showed good model discrimination (C statistic, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.86) and superior recurrence risk classification compared with explant Milan criteria (net reclassification index, 0.40; P = .001) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We have developed and validated a simple and novel prognostic score that may improve post-LT HCC surveillance strategies and help identify patients who may benefit from future adjuvant therapies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mazzaferro, V., Regalia, E., Doci, R., Andreola, S., Pulvirenti, A., Bozzetti, F., Montalto, F., Ammatuna, M., Morabito, A., & Gennari, L. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199603143341104 · Cited by 7,186
Pencina, M. J., D' Agostino, R. B., D' Agostino, R. B., & Vasan, R. S. (2008) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2929 · Cited by 6,493
Acute Abdomen: A Rare Case of Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Gloor, S., Jensen, K. O., Breitenstein, S., Binkert, C. A., Angst, E., & Hetzer, F. H. (2017) · Case Reports in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1159/000463378 · Cited by 5,370
Primary carcinoma of the liver.A study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies
Edmondson, H. A., & Steiner, P. E. (1954) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::aid-cncr2820070308>3.0.co;2-e · Cited by 2,772
Mazzaferro, V., Llovet, J. M., Miceli, R., Bhoori, S., Schiavo, M., Mariani, L., Camerini, T., Roayaie, S., Schwartz, M. E., Grazi, G. L., et al. (2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70284-5 · Cited by 2,045
Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: The Framingham Study risk score functions
Sullivan, L. M., Massaro, J. M., & D'Agostino, R. B. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1742 · Cited by 1,753
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Liver transplantation
(2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.10.006 · Cited by 1,082
Clavien, P.-A., Lesurtel, M., Bossuyt, P. M., Gores, G. J., Langer, B., & Perrier, A. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70175-9 · Cited by 1,026
Duvoux, C., Roudot–Thoraval, F., Decaens, T., Pessione, F., Badran, H., Piardi, T., Francoz, C., Compagnon, P., Vanlemmens, C., Dumortier, J., et al. (2012) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.052 · Cited by 955
Yao, F. Y., Xiao, L., Bass, N. M., Kerlan, R., Ascher, N. L., & Roberts, J. P. (2007) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01965.x · Cited by 562
Self-citation
Cited by
Marrero, J. A., Kulik, L. M., Sirlin, C. B., Zhu, A. X., Finn, R. S., Abecassis, M. M., Roberts, L. R., & Heimbach, J. K. (2018) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29913 · Cited by 4,539
Self-citationAASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
Singal, A. G., Llovet, J. M., Yarchoan, M., Mehta, N., Heimbach, J. K., Dawson, L. A., Jou, J. H., Kulik, L. M., Agopian, V. G., Marrero, J. A., et al. (2023) · Hepatology · doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000000466 · Cited by 2,052
“[245,246] Both the Metroticket 2.0 [247] and French AFP models [248] demonstrated that a combination of AFP and tumor burden predicts post-LT outcome better than tumor burden alone.”
InfluentialSelf-citationMehta, N., Frenette, C., Tabrizian, P., Hoteit, M., Guy, J., Parikh, N., Ghaziani, T. T., Dhanasekaran, R., Dodge, J. L., Natarajan, B., et al. (2021) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.033 · Cited by 154
Self-citationVerna, E. C., Phipps, M. M., Halazun, K. J., Markovic, D., Florman, S. S., Haydel, B. M., Ruiz, R., Klintmalm, G., Lee, D. D., Taner, B., et al. (2023) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1097/lvt.0000000000000007 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mehta, N., Heimbach, J., Harnois, D. M., Sapisochin, G., Dodge, J. L., Lee, D., Burns, J. M., Sanchez, W., Greig, P. D., Grant, D. R., Roberts, J. P., & Yao, F. Y.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-04-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 493
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2553293686
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 13.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5116
- The paper
- Mehta, N., Heimbach, J., Harnois, D. M., Sapisochin, G., Dodge, J. L., Lee, D., Burns, J. M., Sanchez, W., Greig, P. D., Grant, D. R., Roberts, J. P., & Yao, F. Y. (2017). Validation of a Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplant. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.