Cited by 313Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

EGFR–TKI-Associated Interstitial Pneumonitis in Nivolumab-Treated Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Oshima, Yasuo, Tanimoto, Tetsuya, Yuji, Koichiro, Tojo, Arinobu·2018·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

Importance: Nivolumab and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are now the standard-of-care therapies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although EGFR-TKIs are well understood and have well-defined safety profiles, our experience with immune checkpoint inhibitors is still growing, particularly regarding the use of combinations of different classes of antitumor agents, including both the concomitant and sequential use of such agents. Objective: To determine whether nivolumab increases EGFR-TKI-associated interstitial pneumonitis (IP). Design, Setting, and Participants: A database study of 20 516 participants with NSCLC in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, performed between April 2015 and March 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: We compared the incidence of EGFR-TKI-associated IP in patients receiving and not receiving nivolumab treatment. Results: The mean (SD) age of participants treated with EGFR-TKI, with and without nivolumab, was 64.4 (15.5) and 68.9 (11.8) years, respectively, and the proportion of men was 40.0% and 53.8%, respectively. Of the 20 516 participants with NSCLC, 985 cases (4.80%; 95% CI, 4.51-5.10) developed IP. Of 5777 patients treated with EGFR-TKI, 265 developed IP (4.59%; 95% CI, 4.06-5.16). Of 70 patients treated with both EGFR-TKI and nivolumab, 18 developed IP (25.7%; 95% CI, 16.0-37.6). The adjusted odds ratio for an interaction between EGFR-TKI and nivolumab was 4.31 (95% CI, 2.37-7.86; P < .001), suggesting the existence of an interaction. When we further stratified the patients by treatment with and without nivolumab, the odds ratio of EGFR-TKI-associated IP in cases with and without nivolumab treatment was 5.09 (95% CI, 2.87-9.03) and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.00-1.47), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: We found a higher proportion of reports of IP for nivolumab in combination with EGFR-TKI vs treatment with either drug alone. Owing to the limitations of this study, the results warrant further confirmation. However, careful consideration should be given to the possibility of an increased risk of IP when EGFR-TKI is administered in combination with nivolumab, including concomitant and sequential use, and careful monitoring for IP is recommended.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4526

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients receiving nivolumab plus erlotinib might have a higher risk of treatment-associated interstitial pneumonitis (odds ratio 4.31, P < 0.001) relative to patients undergoing EGFR-TKI monotherapy.

    “However, a retrospective study found that patients receiving nivolumab plus erlotinib might have a higher risk of treatment-associated interstitial pneumonitis (Odds ratio: 4.31, P < 0.001), relative to patients undergoing EGFR-TKI monotherapy [191].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 313

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ahn M, Yang J, Yu H, et al. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of MEDI4736 (durvalumab [D]), a human IgG1 anti-programmed cell death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, combined with gefitinib (G): A phase I expansion in TKI-naïve patients (pts) with EGFR mutant NSCLC. European Lung Cancer conference 2016. Geneva, Switzerland April 15, 2016 (Abstract #136-O).

Authors
Oshima, Y., Tanimoto, T., Yuji, K., & Tojo, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation (JP)
Corresponding author
Oshima, Yasuo
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2018-08-01
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
1112
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2782863308
Cited by
313
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17
FWCI
25.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
interstitial pneumonitis, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, nivolumab, non-small cell lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, drug-drug interactions, adverse drug reactions, drug safety, combination therapy, adverse event reporting system, FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
MeSH terms
Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Gefitinib, Nivolumab, Afatinib, Acrylamides, Aged, Aniline Compounds, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Indoles, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Prognosis, Pyrimidines, Databases, Factual, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review