The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Advanced, Metastatic Adenocarcinoma or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: The Phase 2 KEYNOTE-180 Study
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Effective treatment options are limited for patients with advanced, metastatic esophageal cancer progressing after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for patients with advanced, metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or advanced, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction that progressed after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 2, open-label, interventional, single-arm study, KEYNOTE-180, enrolled 121 patients from January 12, 2016, to March 21, 2017, from 57 sites in 10 countries. Patients had advanced, metastatic esophageal cancer that progressed after 2 or more lines of therapy and had evaluable tumor samples for biomarkers. INTERVENTIONS: Pembrolizumab, 200 mg, was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or study withdrawal, for up to 2 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end point was objective response rate per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors by central imaging review for all patients. RESULTS: As of September 18, 2017, of 121 enrolled patients (100 men and 21 women; median age, 65 years [range, 33-87 years]), 18 (14.9%) had undergone 3 or more prior therapies, 63 (52.1%) had ESCC, and 58 (47.9%) had tumors positive for programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), defined as a combined positive score of 10 or higher assessed by immunohistochemistry. Median duration of follow-up was 5.8 months (range, 0.2-18.3 months). Objective response rate was 9.9% (95% CI, 5.2%-16.7%) among all patients (12 of 121), and median duration of response was not reached (range, 1.9-14.4 months). Objective response rate was 14.3% (95% CI, 6.7%-25.4%) among patients with ESCC (9 of 63), 5.2% (95% CI, 1.1%-14.4%) among patients with adenocarcinoma (3 of 58), 13.8% (95% CI, 6.1%-25.4%) among patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (8 of 58), and 6.3% (95% CI, 1.8%-15.5%) among patients with PD-L1-negative tumors (4 of 63). Overall, 15 patients (12.4%) had treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events. Only 5 patients (4.1%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. There was 1 treatment-related death from pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Where effective treatment options are an unmet need, pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity with manageable safety in patients with heavily pretreated esophageal cancer. Phase 3 studies evaluating pembrolizumab vs standard therapy for patients with esophageal cancer progressing after first-line therapy or in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer are ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02559687.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Herbst, R. S., Baas, P., Kim, D.-W., Felip, E., Pérez-Gracia, J. L., Han, J.-Y., Molina, J., Kim, J.-H., Arvis, C. D., Ahn, M.-J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01281-7 · Cited by 6,449
Cited by
Sun, J.-M., Shen, L., Shah, M. A., Enzinger, P., Adenis, A., Doi, T., Kojima, T., Metges, J.-P., Li, Z., Kim, S.-B., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01234-4 · Cited by 1,635
Self-citationPD-L1 as a biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Doroshow, D. B., Bhalla, S., Beasley, M. B., Sholl, L. M., Kerr, K. M., Gnjatic, S., Wistuba, I. I., Rimm, D. L., Tsao, M. S., & Hirsch, F. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00473-5 · Cited by 1,575
Acquired Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Schoenfeld, A. J., & Hellmann, M. D. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.017 · Cited by 955
Cancer Immunotherapy Update: FDA-Approved Checkpoint Inhibitors and Companion Diagnostics
Twomey, J. D., & Zhang, B. (2021) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-021-00574-0 · Cited by 657
Advances in targeted therapy for esophageal cancer
Yang, Y.-M., Hong, P., Xu, W. W., He, Q.-Y., & Li, B. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00323-3 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, M. A., Kojima, T., Hochhauser, D., Enzinger, P., Raimbourg, J., Hollebecque, A., Lordick, F., Kim, S.-B., Tajika, M., Kim, H. T., Lockhart, A. C., Arkenau, H.-T., El-Hajbi, F., Gupta, M., Pfeiffer, P., Liu, Q., Lunceford, J., Kang, S. P., Bhagia, P., & Kato, K.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-04-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 546
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2906166963
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 53.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Advanced, Metastatic Adenocarcinoma or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: The Phase 2 KEYNOTE-180 Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5441
- The paper
- Shah, M. A., Kojima, T., Hochhauser, D., Enzinger, P., Raimbourg, J., Hollebecque, A., Lordick, F., Kim, S.-B., Tajika, M., Kim, H. T., Lockhart, A. C., Arkenau, H.-T., El-Hajbi, F., Gupta, M., Pfeiffer, P., Liu, Q., Lunceford, J., Kang, S. P., Bhagia, P., & Kato, K. (2019). Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Advanced, Metastatic Adenocarcinoma or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: The Phase 2 KEYNOTE-180 Study. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.