Effect of Metformin Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Compared With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Alone in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Metformin hydrochloride is emerging as a repurposed anticancer drug. Preclinical and retrospective studies have shown that it improves outcomes across a wide variety of neoplasms, including lung cancer. Particularly, evidence is accumulating regarding the synergistic association between metformin and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). OBJECTIVE: To assess the progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who received treatment with EGFR-TKIs plus metformin compared with those who received EGFR-TKIs alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had histologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV lung adenocarcinoma with an activating EGFR mutation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive EGFR-TKIs (erlotinib hydrochloride, afatinib dimaleate, or gefitinib at standard dosage) plus metformin hydrochloride (500 mg twice a day) or EGFR-TKIs alone. Treatment was continued until occurrence of intolerable toxic effects or withdrawal of consent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was PFS in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included objective response rate, disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Between March 31, 2016, and December 31, 2017, a total of 139 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.4 [12.0] years; 65.5% female) were randomly assigned to receive EGFR-TKIs (n = 70) or EGFR-TKIs plus metformin (n = 69). The median PFS was significantly longer in the EGFR-TKIs plus metformin group (13.1; 95% CI, 9.8-16.3 months) compared with the EGFR-TKIs group (9.9; 95% CI, 7.5-12.2 months) (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.94; P = .03). The median OS was also significantly longer for patients receiving the combination therapy (31.7; 95% CI, 20.5-42.8 vs 17.5; 95% CI, 11.4-23.7 months; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: To our knowledge, this is the first study to prospectively show that the addition of metformin to standard EGFR-TKIs therapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma significantly improves PFS. These results justify the design of a phase 3, placebo-controlled study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03071705.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Metformin has additional benefit for conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome, atherosclerosis, cancer, COVID-19, and obesity.
“Aside from its anti-hyperglycemic effects, metformin has an additional benefit for conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome, atherosclerosis, cancer, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and obesity (7–14).”
From GDF-15 as a Weight Watcher for Diabetic and Non-Diabetic People Treated With Metformin (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 179
- Authors
- Arrieta, O., Barrón, F., Padilla, M.-Á. S., Avilés-Salas, A., Ramírez-Tirado, L. A., Arguelles Jiménez, M. J., Vergara, E., Zatarain-Barrón, Z. L., Hernández-Pedro, N., Cardona, A. F., Cruz-Rico, G., Barrios-Bernal, P., Yamamoto Ramos, M., & Rosell, R.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (MX)
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico
- Universidad El Bosque (CO)
- Department of Radiology and Imaging, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico
- Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Arrieta, Oscar
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-11-14
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e192553
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6735425
- OpenAlex
- W2972170432
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- metformin, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, erlotinib, afatinib, gefitinib, progression-free survival, drug repurposing, combination therapy, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, overall survival, objective response rate, safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review