Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 631

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non–Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Open access
Molinaro, Annette M., Hervey-Jumper, Shawn, Morshed, Ramin A., Young, Jacob, Han, Seunggu J., Chunduru, Pranathi, Zhang, Yalan, Phillips, Joanna J., Shai, Anny, Lafontaine, Marisa, Crane, Jason, Chandra, Ankush, Flanigan, Patrick, Jahangiri, Arman, Cioffi, Gino, Ostrom, Quinn, Anderson, John E., Badve, Chaitra, Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill, Sloan, Andrew E., Erickson, Bradley J., Decker, Paul A., Kosel, Matthew L., LaChance, Daniel, Eckel-Passow, Jeanette, Jenkins, Robert, Villanueva-Meyer, Javier, Rice, Terri, Wrensch, Margaret, Wiencke, John K., Oberheim Bush, Nancy Ann, Taylor, Jennie, Butowski, Nicholas, Prados, Michael, Clarke, Jennifer, Chang, Susan, Chang, Edward, Aghi, Manish, Theodosopoulos, Philip, McDermott, Michael, Berger, Mitchel S.·2020·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

Importance: Per the World Health Organization 2016 integrative classification, newly diagnosed glioblastomas are separated into isocitrate dehydrogenase gene 1 or 2 (IDH)-wild-type and IDH-mutant subtypes, with median patient survival of 1.2 and 3.6 years, respectively. Although maximal resection of contrast-enhanced (CE) tumor is associated with longer survival, the prognostic importance of maximal resection within molecular subgroups and the potential importance of resection of non-contrast-enhanced (NCE) disease is poorly understood. Objective: To assess the association of resection of CE and NCE tumors in conjunction with molecular and clinical information to develop a new road map for cytoreductive surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included a development cohort from the University of California, San Francisco (761 patients diagnosed from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2017, with 9.6 years of follow-up) and validation cohorts from the Mayo Clinic (107 patients diagnosed from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014, with 5.7 years of follow-up) and the Ohio Brain Tumor Study (99 patients with data collected from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2011, with a median follow-up of 10.9 months). Image accessors were blinded to patient groupings. Eligible patients underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed glioblastoma and had available survival, molecular, and clinical data and preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images. Data were analyzed from November 15, 2018, to March 15, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival. Results: Among the 761 patients included in the development cohort (468 [61.5%] men; median age, 60 [interquartile range, 51.6-67.7] years), younger patients with IDH-wild-type tumors and aggressive resection of CE and NCE tumors had survival similar to that of patients with IDH-mutant tumors (median overall survival [OS], 37.3 [95% CI, 31.6-70.7] months). Younger patients with IDH-wild-type tumors and reduction of CE tumor but residual NCE tumors fared worse (median OS, 16.5 [95% CI, 14.7-18.3] months). Older patients with IDH-wild-type tumors benefited from reduction of CE tumor (median OS, 12.4 [95% CI, 11.4-14.0] months). The results were validated in the 2 external cohorts. The association between aggressive CE and NCE in patients with IDH-wild-type tumors was not attenuated by the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Conclusions and Relevance: This study confirms an association between maximal resection of CE tumor and OS in patients with glioblastoma across all subgroups. In addition, maximal resection of NCE tumor was associated with longer OS in younger patients, regardless of IDH status, and among patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma regardless of the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. These conclusions may help reassess surgical strategies for individual patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6143

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 631

Metadata

Authors
Molinaro, A. M., Hervey-Jumper, S., Morshed, R. A., Young, J., Han, S. J., Chunduru, P., Zhang, Y., Phillips, J. J., Shai, A., Lafontaine, M., Crane, J., Chandra, A., Flanigan, P., Jahangiri, A., Cioffi, G., Ostrom, Q., Anderson, J. E., Badve, C., Barnholtz-Sloan, J., Sloan, A. E., Erickson, B. J., Decker, P. A., Kosel, M. L., LaChance, D., Eckel-Passow, J., Jenkins, R., Villanueva-Meyer, J., Rice, T., Wrensch, M., Wiencke, J. K., Oberheim Bush, N. A., Taylor, J., Butowski, N., Prados, M., Clarke, J., Chang, S., Chang, E., Aghi, M., Theodosopoulos, P., McDermott, M., & Berger, M. S.
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2020-04-01
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
495
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005337228
Cited by
631
References
26
FWCI
35.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non–Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6143
The paper
Molinaro, A. M., Hervey-Jumper, S., Morshed, R. A., Young, J., Han, S. J., Chunduru, P., Zhang, Y., Phillips, J. J., Shai, A., Lafontaine, M., Crane, J., Chandra, A., Flanigan, P., Jahangiri, A., Cioffi, G., Ostrom, Q., Anderson, J. E., Badve, C., Barnholtz-Sloan, J., . . . Berger, M. S. (2020). Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non–Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6143

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.