Diabetic Retinopathy and Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Importance The association between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and quality of life (QoL) has not been thoroughly investigated. Objective To investigate the association between DR and both vision-related QoL (VRQoL) and general health-related QoL (HRQoL). Data sources MEDLINE, EBSCO, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from their inception to April 2022. Study selection Studies included adults with DR and a measure of QoL. Data extraction and synthesis Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Two assumption-free meta-analyses were conducted. Analysis 1 included studies with participants without DR as the referent group to which QoL scores of participants with DR, grouped according to DR severity, were compared. Analysis 2 included all studies with participants with DR and a measure of QoL. QoL scores were pooled within categories of DR severity, and comparisons were made between these categories. Main outcome and measures QoL measured using HRQoL and VRQoL scales. Results A total of 93 articles were included: 79 in the meta-analyses and 14 in the narrative results. VRQoL was recorded in 54 studies, HRQoL in 26, and both in 13 studies. The most commonly used scales were the National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) (n = 49) for VRQoL and the Short Form (SF) Health Survey (n = 18) for HRQoL. Thirty-five studies reported VFQ-25 composite scores. Analysis 1 consisted of 8 studies including 1138 part…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DR severity is associated with a graded decline in vision-related quality of life, and even non-vision-threatening DR may be associated with worse VRQoL.
“Zayed and colleagues' systematic review and meta-analysis found that DR severity is associated with a graded decline in vision-related quality of life (VRQoL), and that even non-vision-threatening DR may be associated with worse VRQoL (27).”
From From validation to public health impact: implementing equitable AI-enabled diabetic retinopathy screening (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Generic health-related quality-of-life instruments may be less sensitive than vision-specific measures for DR, and visual acuity alone does not fully explain patient experience.
“The review also suggested that generic health-related quality-of-life instruments may be less sensitive than vision-specific measures, and that visual acuity alone does not fully explain patient experience.”
From From validation to public health impact: implementing equitable AI-enabled diabetic retinopathy screening (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Shared decision making — The pinnacle of patient-centered care
Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1109283 · Cited by 3,433 · see citing works
Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields
Kmet, L. M., Cook, L. S., & Lee, R. C. (2004) · University of Alberta Library · doi:10.7939/r37m04f16 · Cited by 1,682 · see citing works
Fenwick, E. K., Xie, J., Ratcliffe, J., Pesudovs, K., Finger, R. P., Wong, T. Y., & Lamoureux, E. L. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8992 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, J., & Chen, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1976572
- Authors
- Zayed, M. G., Karsan, W., Peto, T., Saravanan, P., Virgili, G., & Preiss, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- George Eliot Hospital (GB)
- Fondazione G.B. Bietti (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Zayed, Mohammed G.
- Saravanan, Ponnusamy
- Venue
- JAMA Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2024-03-01
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 199
- ISSN
- 2168-6165 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10835609
- OpenAlex
- W4391430818
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- diabetic retinopathy, quality of life, vision-related quality of life, health-related quality of life, VFQ-25, retinopathy severity, visual function, diabetes complications, patient-reported outcomes, health care costs, health care utilization
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Retinopathy, Health Surveys, Humans, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vision, Ocular, Visual Acuity, Sickness Impact Profile
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review