Ocular Adverse Events With Semaglutide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Semaglutide is a widely used treatment for diabetes and obesity, offering considerable cardiovascular benefit. However, its association with ocular adverse events remains uncertain. Objective: To assess the incidence of eye disorders, diabetic retinopathy, and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) in adults treated with semaglutide. Data Sources: A comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted on April 10, 2025, without date restrictions. Study Selection: Investigators independently screened records to identify randomized clinical trials comparing semaglutide with either an active comparator or placebo in adults, assessing ocular adverse events. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Descriptive synthesis of the included studies was performed. The random-effects model using the inverse variance method was used to summarize the odds ratio (OR) for eye disorders and diabetic retinopathy. Peto OR with a fixed-effects model was applied for NAION. Risk of bias was assessed with the RoB 2.0 tool and quality of evidence with GRADE. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to determine whether the available data were sufficient for definitive conclusions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes included the number of patients experiencing an ocular adverse event, diabetic retinopathy, or NAION. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on follow-up duration, comparator type, and primary baseline condition. Results: A total of 78 trials with 73 640 participants were included. Semaglutide did not increase or reduce the risk of eye disorders (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.91-1.12) or diabetic retinopathy (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17). Treatment with semaglutide was associated with a significant odds of NAION (OR, 3.92; 95% CI, 1.02-15.02). Overall risk of bias was low. TSA provided evidence that the sample size was sufficient to avoid missing alternative results for diabetic retinopathy but not for NAION. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that semaglutide was not associated with an increased risk of eye disorders or diabetic retinopathy. Despite the fact that an association between semaglutide treatment and NAION was found, current evidence remains insufficient to establish definitive conclusions regarding its association with NAION. Further studies with larger sample sizes and adequate evaluation of NAION are warranted to clarify this potential risk.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To address measured baseline confounding, propensity scores for semaglutide initiation were estimated using logistic regression with all baseline covariates, applying overlap weighting.
“To address measured baseline confounding, we estimated propensity scores for semaglutide initiation using logistic regression with all baseline covariates,10 applying overlap weighting via PSweight R package.11”
From New-Onset Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy and Initiators of Semaglutide in US Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Absolute incidence of NAION remains low, approximately 1 additional case per several thousand treated patients.
“Absolute incidence remains low (approximately 1 additional case per several thousand treated patients).13.”
From New-Onset Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy and Initiators of Semaglutide in US Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes (2026) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Natividade, G. R., Spiazzi, B. F., Baumgarten, M. W., Bassotto, C., Pereira, A. A., Fraga, B. L., Scalco, B. G., Mattes, N. R., Lavinsky, D., Kramer, C. K., & Gerchman, F.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2025-09-01
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 759
- ISSN
- 2168-6165 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12355393
- OpenAlex
- W4413139441
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 8.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- semaglutide, ocular adverse effects, diabetic retinopathy, nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, eye diseases, GLP-1 receptor agonists, obesity treatment, diabetes treatment, drug safety, trial sequential analysis, risk of bias assessment, quality of evidence grading, follow-up duration, subgroup analysis, cardiovascular benefits, adverse event incidence
- MeSH terms
- Semaglutide, Diabetic Retinopathy, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Incidence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Optic Neuropathy, Ischemic, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review