CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 144Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsEducational Methods and Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactive Media Use at Younger Than the Age of 2 Years: Time to Rethink the American Academy of Pediatrics Guideline?

Christakis, Dimitri A.·2014·JAMA Pediatrics
DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5081
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) reaffirmed its original statement on infants and media, leaving the 1999 recommendation essentially unchanged stating "we discourage the use of media by children under the age of two." 1 Although published in October 2011, the policy statement had been completed much earlier owing to the lengthy internal review process of the AAP. 1,2The timing is notable because the iPad debuted in April 2010, meaning that the statement was drafted with no knowledge that such a device would ever exist.Now, 3 years later, we still know surprisingly little about how iPads and other interactive media technologies affect children's cognition-research is simply unable to keep up with the pace of technological advancesand these devices are increasingly popular.The salient question then is whether the discourage media verbiage of the 2011 statement should be applied to them.I should disclose that I am a member of the executive committee of the AAP Council on Communications and Media and a co-author of the 2011 statement but that I speak only for myself in this Viewpoint.I should also point out that much of the science underpinning that recommendation is based on research with which I have been involved.Although I and others are currently studying the effects of these new technologies, it will be years before we have robust data about their effects.Accordingly, I want to offer my opinion on what the recommendation regarding them should be based largely on theoretical, rather than empirical, grounds.By way of background, I believe that there is a direct and an indirect pathway by which media affect child behavior and development.The direct pathway is based entirely on the content viewed and its formal features.4][5] The indirect pathway is mediated by displacement.Simply put, there are only so many hours in a day, and time spent with media (even educational programming) comes at the expense of some other-potentially developmentally salubrious-activity (eg, playing or reading).To be sure, an iPad (or other interactive device) can function as nothing more than a video screen in which case the data acquired from research on televisions surely applies.But if it is being used in the context of one of the thousands of interactive applications currently designed for children, there are significant theoretical and practical differences that warrant consideration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5081

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–144 of 144

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Christakis, D. A.
Affiliations
Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Christakis, Dimitri A.
ORCID
Christakis, Dimitri A.
Venue
JAMA Pediatrics
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
168
Issue
5
Pages
399
ISSN
  • 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6203
DOI
10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5081
OpenAlex
W2071347942
Cited by
144
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4
FWCI
102.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
Keywords
interactive media, infants, toddlers, iPad, screen time, American Academy of Pediatrics policy, child development, displacement, educational programming, cognitive effects of media, screen-based learning
MeSH terms
Computers, Humans, Infant, Pediatrics, Play and Playthings, Societies, Medical, Time Factors, United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review