The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiologic Trends in Neonatal Intensive Care, 2007-2012
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Neonatal intensive care has been highly effective at improving newborn outcomes but is expensive and carries inherent risks. Existing studies of neonatal intensive care have focused on specific subsets of newborns and lack a population-based perspective. OBJECTIVES: To describe admission rates to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) for US newborns across the entire continuum of birth weight and how these rates have changed across time, as well as describe the characteristics of infants admitted to NICUs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An epidemiologic time-trend analysis was conducted on April 1, 2015, of live births (≥500 g) from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2012, to residents of 38 US states and the District of Columbia, recorded using the 2003 revision of the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth (N = 17,896,048). EXPOSURE: Birth year. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Crude, stratified (by birth weight), and adjusted admission rates. Trends in birth weight, gestational age, weight for gestational age, and use of assisted ventilation are presented to describe the cohort of admitted newborns. RESULTS: In 2012, there were 43.0 NICU admissions per 1000 normal-birth-weight infants (2500-3999 g), while the admission rate for very low-birth-weight infants (<1500 g) was 844.1 per 1000 live births. Overall, admission rates during the 6-year study period increased from 64.0 to 77.9 per 1000 live births (relative rate, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.21-1.22 [P < .001]). Admission rates increased for all birth weight categories. Trends in relative rates adjusted for maternal and newborn characteristics showed a similar 23% increase (95% CI, 1.22-1.23 [P < .001]). During the study period, newborns admitted to a NICU were larger and less premature, although no consistent trend was seen in weight for gestational age or the use of assisted ventilation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: After adjustment for infant and maternal risk factors, US newborns at all birth weights are increasingly likely to be admitted to a NICU, which raises the possibility of overuse of neonatal intensive care in some newborns. Further study is needed into the causes of the increased use observed in our study as well as its implications for payers, policymakers, families, and newborns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, Barfield, W. D., Papile, L.-A., Baley, J. E., Benitz, W., Cummings, J., Carlo, W. A., Kumar, P., Polin, R. A., Tan, R. C., et al. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1999 · Cited by 959
Parents’ responses to stress in the neonatal intensive care unit
Busse, M., Stromgren, K., Thorngate, L., & Thomas, K. A. (2013) · Critical Care Nurse · doi:10.4037/ccn2013715 · Cited by 254
A revised birth weight reference for the United States
Duryea, E. L., Hawkins, J. S., McIntire, D. D., Casey, B. M., & Leveno, K. J. (2014) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000345 · Cited by 239
Cited by
Binodal, wireless epidermal electronic systems with in-sensor analytics for neonatal intensive care
Chung, H. U., Kim, B. H., Lee, J. Y., Lee, J., Xie, Z., Ibler, E. M., Lee, K., Banks, A., Jeong, J. Y., Kim, J., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau0780 · Cited by 807
Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research
Webbe, J. W. H., Duffy, J. M. N., Afonso, E., Al-Muzaffar, I., Brunton, G., Greenough, A., Hall, N. J., Knight, M., Latour, J. M., Lee-Davey, C., et al. (2020) · Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2019-317501 · Cited by 235
NICU Hospitalization: Long-Term Implications on Parenting and Child Behaviors
Lean, R. E., Rogers, C. E., Paul, R. A., & Gerstein, E. D. (2018) · Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s40746-018-0112-5 · Cited by 155
Bonacquisti, A., Geller, P. A., & Patterson, C. A. (2020) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646838.2019.1695041 · Cited by 117
Care system redesign for preterm children after discharge from the NICU
Kuo, D. Z., Lyle, R. E., Casey, P. H., & Stille, C. J. (2017) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2969 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, W., & Goodman, D.
- Venue
- JAMA Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-09-01
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 855
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-6203
- OpenAlex
- W1637094318
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiologic Trends in Neonatal Intensive Care, 2007-2012. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1305
- The paper
- Harrison, W., & Goodman, D. (2015). Epidemiologic Trends in Neonatal Intensive Care, 2007-2012. JAMA Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.