CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 115Child Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association Between Screen Time Trajectory and Early Childhood Development in Children in China

Open access
Zhao, Jin, Yu, Zhangsheng, Sun, Xiaoning, Wu, Saishuang, Zhang, Jun, Zhang, Donglan, Zhang, Yunting, Jiang, Fan·2022·JAMA Pediatrics
DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1630PMC PMC9171655
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Importance: Screen time has become an integral part of children's daily lives. Nevertheless, the developmental consequences of screen exposure in young children remain unclear. Objective: To investigate the screen time trajectory from 6 to 72 months of age and its association with children's development at age 72 months in a prospective birth cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: Women in Shanghai, China, who were at 34 to 36 gestational weeks and had an expected delivery date between May 2012 and July 2013 were recruited for this cohort study. Their children were followed up at 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 72 months of age. Children's screen time was classified into 3 groups at age 6 months: continued low (ie, stable amount of screen time), late increasing (ie, sharp increase in screen time at age 36 months), and early increasing (ie, large amount of screen time in early stages that remained stable after age 36 months). Cognitive development was assessed by specially trained research staff in a research clinic. Of 262 eligible mother-offspring pairs, 152 dyads had complete data regarding all variables of interest and were included in the analyses. Data were analyzed from September 2019 to November 2021. Exposures: Mothers reported screen times of children at 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 72 months of age. Main Outcomes and Measures: The cognitive development of children was evaluated using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 4th edition, at age 72 months. Social-emotional development was measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, which was completed by the child's mother. The study described demographic characteristics, maternal mental health, child's temperament at age 6 months, and mental development at age 12 months by subgroups clustered by a group-based trajectory model. Group difference was examined by analysis of variance. Results: A total of 152 mother-offspring dyads were included in this study, including 77 girls (50.7%) and 75 boys (49.3%) (mean [SD] age of the mothers was 29.7 [3.3] years). Children's screen time trajectory from age 6 to 72 months was classified into 3 groups: continued low (110 [72.4%]), late increasing (17 [11.2%]), and early increasing (25 [16.4%]). Compared with the continued low group, the late increasing group had lower scores on the Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (β coefficient, -8.23; 95% CI, -15.16 to -1.30; P < .05) and the General Ability Index (β coefficient, -6.42; 95% CI, -13.70 to 0.86; P = .08); the early increasing group presented with lower scores on the Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (β coefficient, -6.68; 95% CI, -12.35 to -1.02; P < .05) and the Cognitive Proficiency Index (β coefficient, -10.56; 95% CI, -17.23 to -3.90; P < .01) and a higher total difficulties score (β coefficient, 2.62; 95% CI, 0.49-4.76; P < .05). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that excessive screen time in early years was associated with poor cognitive and social-emotional development. This finding may be helpful in encouraging awareness among parents of the importance of onset and duration of children's screen time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1630

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lin, 2021, Cohort profile: the Shanghai Sleep Birth Cohort Study., Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 35, 257, 10.1111/ppe.v35.2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, J., Yu, Z., Sun, X., Wu, S., Zhang, J., Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., & Jiang, F.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Yunting
  • Jiang, Fan
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Pediatrics
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2022-08-01
Volume
176
Issue
8
Pages
768
ISSN
  • 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6203
DOI
10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1630
PMC
PMC9171655
OpenAlex
W4281854926
Cited by
115
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 1
FWCI
48.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Shanghai Municipal Health Commission
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
screen time, early childhood development, cognitive development, social-emotional development, toddlers, infant temperament, maternal mental health, birth cohort, child mental health, group-based trajectory modeling
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, China, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review