Cited by 12Schizophrenia research and treatmentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Neurodevelopmental Trajectories, Disconnection, and Schizophrenia Risk

Keshavan, Matcheri S., Paus, Tomas·2015·JAMA Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1119

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 12

Authors
Keshavan, M. S., & Paus, T.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • The Rotman Research Institute, Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada3Child Mind Institute, New York, New York
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2015-09-01
Volume
72
Issue
9
Pages
943
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1555896506
Cited by
12
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH064023, R01MH085772, MH-64023)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
neurodevelopmental trajectories, brain disconnection, schizophrenia risk, brain development, schizophrenia risk factors
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Occipital Lobe, Schizophrenia, Temporal Lobe, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review