Real-World Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Treatments in a Nationwide Cohort of 29 823 Patients With Schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
Importance: It has remained unclear whether there are clinically meaningful differences between antipsychotic treatments with regard to preventing relapse of schizophrenia, owing to the impossibility of including large unselected patient populations in randomized clinical trials, as well as residual confounding from selection biases in observational studies. Objective: To study the comparative real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments for patients with schizophrenia. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospectively gathered nationwide databases were linked to study the risk of rehospitalization and treatment failure from July 1, 2006, to December 31, 2013, among all patients in Sweden with a schizophrenia diagnosis who were 16 to 64 years of age in 2006 (29 823 patients in the total prevalent cohort; 4603 in the incident cohort of newly diagnosed patients). Within-individual analyses were used for primary analyses, in which each individual was used as his or her own control to eliminate selection bias. Traditional Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression was used for secondary analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk of rehospitalization and treatment failure (defined as psychiatric rehospitalization, suicide attempt, discontinuation or switch to other medication, or death). Results: There were 29 823 patients (12 822 women and 17 001 men; mean [SD] age, 44.9 [12.0] years). During follow-up, 13 042 of 29 823 patients (43.7%) were rehospitalized, and 20 225 of 28 189 patients (71.7%) experienced treatment failure. The risk of psychiatric rehospitalization was the lowest during monotherapy with once-monthly long-acting injectable paliperidone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.64), long-acting injectable zuclopenthixol (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.48-0.57), clozapine (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.48-0.58), long-acting injectable perphenazine (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.52-0.65), and long-acting injectable olanzapine (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.77) compared with no use of antipsychotic medication. Oral flupentixol (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74-1.14), quetiapine (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-1.00), and oral perphenazine (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.97) were associated with the highest risk of rehospitalization. Long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications were associated with substantially lower risk of rehospitalization compared with equivalent oral formulations (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84 in the total cohort; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86 in the incident cohort). Clozapine (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.53-0.63) and all long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications (HRs 0.65-0.80) were associated with the lowest rates of treatment failure compared with the most widely used medication, oral olanzapine. The results of several sensitivity analyses were consistent with those of the primary analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: Clozapine and long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications were the pharmacologic treatments with the highest rates of prevention of relapse in schizophrenia. The risk of rehospitalization is about 20% to 30% lower during long-acting injectable treatments compared with equivalent oral formulations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In addition to the benefits of reduced treatment gaps with LAI versus oral antipsychotics, studies, particularly those in real-world samples, have demonstrated reduced psychopathology, relapses, hospitalizations, and mortality risk with LAI formulations.
“In addition to the benefits of reduced treatment gaps with LAI versus oral antipsychotics, studies, particularly those in real-world samples, have demonstrated reduced psychopathology, relapses, hospitalizations, and mortality risk with LAI formulations [98–104].”
From Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia: An Overview (2021) · cites this paper as [103]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBoth the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of the DPP lifestyle interventions was maintained over a 10-year follow up, even when compared to metformin as a control condition.
“Furthermore, both the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of the DPP lifestyle interventions was maintained over a 10-year follow up, even when compared to metformin as a control condition.234,235”
From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness (2019) · cites this paper as [235]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 670
- Authors
- Tiihonen, J., Mittendorfer-Rutz, E., Majak, M., Mehtälä, J., Hoti, F., Jedenius, E., Enkusson, D., Leval, A., Sermon, J., Tanskanen, A., & Taipale, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- EPID Research Oy, Espoo, Finland
- Janssen-Cilag, Solna, Sweden
- Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Tiihonen, Jari
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-07-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 686
- ISSN
- 2168-622X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5710250
- OpenAlex
- W2623053349
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 12
- FWCI
- 47.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cilag
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, antipsychotic drugs, real-world effectiveness, relapse prevention, psychiatric rehospitalization, treatment failure, long-acting injectable antipsychotics, clozapine, paliperidone, zuclopenthixol, perphenazine, atypical antipsychotics, residual confounding, newly diagnosed patients, Sweden
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Clozapine, Delayed-Action Preparations, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Readmission, Schizophrenia, Sweden, Antipsychotic Agents, Cohort Studies, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Treatment Failure, Secondary Prevention, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review