The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of Injectable Extended-Release Naltrexone vs Daily Buprenorphine-Naloxone for Opioid Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial
Open accessAbstract
Importance: To date, extended-release naltrexone hydrochloride has not previously been compared directly with opioid medication treatment (OMT), currently the most commonly prescribed treatment for opioid dependence. Objective: To determine whether treatment with extended-release naltrexone will be as effective as daily buprenorphine hydrochloride with naloxone hydrochloride in maintaining abstinence from heroin and other illicit substances in newly detoxified individuals. Design, Setting and Participants: A 12-week, multicenter, outpatient, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at 5 urban addiction clinics in Norway between November 1, 2012, and December 23, 2015; the last follow-up was performed on October 23, 2015. A total of 232 adult opioid-dependent (per DSM-IV criteria) individuals were recruited from outpatient addiction clinics and detoxification units and assessed for eligibility. Intention-to-treat analyses of efficacy end points were performed with all randomized participants. Interventions: Randomization to either daily oral flexible dose buprenorphine-naloxone, 4 to 24 mg/d, or extended-release naltrexone hydrochloride, 380 mg, administered intramuscularly every fourth week for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points (protocol) were the randomized clinical trial completion rate, the proportion of opioid-negative urine drug tests, and number of days of use of heroin and other illicit opioids. Secondary end points included number of days of use of other illicit substances. Safety was assessed by adverse event reporting. Results: Of 159 participants, mean (SD) age was 36 (8.6) years and 44 (27.7%) were women. Eighty individuals were randomized to extended-release naltrexone and 79 to buprenorphine-naloxone; 105 (66.0%) completed the trial. Retention in the extended-release naltrexone group was noninferior to the buprenorphine-naloxone group (difference, -0.1; with 95% CI, -0.2 to 0.1; P = .04), with mean (SD) time of 69.3 (25.9) and 63.7 (29.9) days, correspondingly (P = .33, log-rank test). Treatment with extended-release naltrexone showed noninferiority to buprenorphine-naloxone on group proportion of total number of opioid-negative urine drug tests (mean [SD], 0.9 [0.3] and 0.8 [0.4], respectively, difference, 0.1 with 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.2; P < .001) and use of heroin (mean difference, -3.2 with 95% CI, -4.9 to -1.5; P < .001) and other illicit opioids (mean difference, -2.7 with 95% CI, -4.6 to -0.9; P < .001). Superiority analysis showed significantly lower use of heroin and other illicit opioids in the extended-release naltrexone group. No significant differences were found between the treatment groups regarding most other illicit substance use. Conclusions and Relevance: Extended-release naltrexone was as effective as buprenorphine-naloxone in maintaining short-term abstinence from heroin and other illicit substances and should be considered as a treatment option for opioid-dependent individuals. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01717963.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It is possible that inverse agonism of μ and κ-opioid receptors may help to restrict the potential for abuse of (2R,6R)-HNK similar to how naltrexone helps prevent relapse in opioid and alcohol use disorders, however this assertion requires further research”
From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Tanum et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · Cited by 19,139
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 10,216
The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830190102 · Cited by 4,604
Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1992) · Measuring Alcohol Consumption · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0357-5_3 · Cited by 4,110
Drug Dependence, a Chronic Medical Illness
McLellan, A. T., Lewis, D. C., O'Brien, C. P., & Kleber, H. D. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.13.1689 · Cited by 2,622
Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence
Mattick, R. P., Breen, C. L., Kimber, J., & Davoli, M. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002207.pub4 · Cited by 2,312
New Data from the Addiction Severity Index Reliability and Validity in Three Centers
McLELLAN, A. T., LUBORSKY, L., CACCIOLA, J., GRIFFITH, J., EVANS, F., BARR, H. L., & OʼBRIEN, C. P. (1985) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198507000-00005 · Cited by 1,503
Dole, V. P. (1965) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03090080008002 · Cited by 1,240
Medication-Assisted Therapies — Tackling the Opioid-Overdose Epidemic
Volkow, N. D., Frieden, T. R., Hyde, P. S., & Cha, S. S. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1402780 · Cited by 1,014
Timeline Follow-Back: A Technique for Assessing Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption
Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1992) · NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) · Cited by 779
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, J. D., Nunes, E. V., Novo, P., Bachrach, K., Bailey, G. L., Bhatt, S., Farkas, S., Fishman, M., Gauthier, P., Hodgkins, C. C., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32812-x · Cited by 700
Santo, T., Clark, B., Hickman, M., Grebely, J., Campbell, G., Sordo, L., Chen, A. B., Tran, L. T., Bharat, C., Padmanathan, P., et al. (2021) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0976 · Cited by 614
Prevention and Treatment of Opioid Misuse and Addiction: A Review
Volkow, N. D., Jones, E. B., Einstein, E. B., & Wargo, E. M. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3126 · Cited by 596
The changing opioid crisis: development, challenges and opportunities
Volkow, N. D., & Blanco, C. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-020-0661-4 · Cited by 594
The ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: 2020 Focused Update
(2020) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000000633 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanum, L., Solli, K. K., Latif, Z.-E.-H., Benth, J. Š., Opheim, A., Sharma-Haase, K., Krajci, P., & Kunøe, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Akershus University Hospital (NO)
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway4Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- The Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, The University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway7Department of Addiction Medicine, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tonsberg, Norway
- Department of Addiction Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Corresponding author
- Tanum, Lars
- Venue
- JAMA Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1197
- ISSN
- 2168-622X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6583381
- OpenAlex
- W2766969415
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 32.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Norges Forskningsråd
- Haukeland Universitetssjukehus
- Akershus Universitetssykehus
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- buprenorphine/naloxone, opioid use disorder, heroin use, opioid substitution therapy, abstinence, treatment retention, detoxification, intramuscular injection, non-inferiority, illicit drug use, treatment safety, addiction treatment centers, Norway
- MeSH terms
- Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination, Administration, Oral, Adult, Delayed-Action Preparations, Female, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Male, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Substance Abuse Detection, Treatment Outcome, Drug Monitoring, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Opiate Substitution Treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review