Neuropsychiatric Ramifications of Severe COVID-19 and Other Severe Acute Respiratory Infections
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Individuals surviving severe COVID-19 may be at increased risk of neuropsychiatric sequelae. Robust assessment of these risks may help improve clinical understanding of the post-COVID syndrome, aid clinical care during the ongoing pandemic, and inform postpandemic planning. Objective: To quantify the risks of new-onset neuropsychiatric conditions and new neuropsychiatric medication prescriptions after discharge from a COVID-19-related hospitalization, and to compare these with risks after discharge from hospitalization for other severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, adults (≥18 years of age) were identified from QResearch primary care and linked electronic health record databases, including national SARS-CoV-2 testing, hospital episode statistics, intensive care admissions data, and mortality registers in England, from January 24, 2020, to July 7, 2021. Exposures: COVID-19-related or SARI-related hospital admission (including intensive care admission). Main Outcomes and Measures: New-onset diagnoses of neuropsychiatric conditions (anxiety, dementia, psychosis, depression, bipolar disorder) or first prescription for relevant medications (antidepressants, hypnotics/anxiolytics, antipsychotics) during 12 months of follow-up from hospital discharge. Maximally adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs were estimated using flexible parametric survival models. Results: In this cohort study of data from 8.38 million adults (4.18 million women, 4.20 million men; mean [SD] age 49.18 [18.45] years); 16 679 (0.02%) survived a hospital admission for SARI, and 32 525 (0.03%) survived a hospital admission for COVID-19. Compared with the remaining population, survivors of SARI and COVID-19 hospitalization had higher risks of subsequent neuropsychiatric diagnoses. For example, the HR for anxiety in survivors of SARI was 1.86 (95% CI, 1.56-2.21) and for survivors of COVID-19 infection was 2.36 (95% CI, 2.03-2.74); the HR for dementia for survivors of SARI was 2.55 (95% CI, 2.17-3.00) and for survivors of COVID-19 infection was 2.63 (95% CI, 2.21-3.14). Similar findings were observed for all medications analyzed; for example, the HR for first prescriptions of antidepressants in survivors of SARI was 2.55 (95% CI, 2.24-2.90) and for survivors of COVID-19 infection was 3.24 (95% CI, 2.91-3.61). There were no significant differences observed when directly comparing the COVID-19 group with the SARI group apart from a lower risk of antipsychotic prescriptions in the former (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.92). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the neuropsychiatric sequelae of severe COVID-19 infection were found to be similar to those for other SARI. This finding may inform postdischarge support for people surviving SARI.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The increased risk of MDD after COVID-19 may be transient and similar to non-COVID severe respiratory infections.
“However, this risk may be transient and similar to non-COVID severe respiratory infections122.”
From Comorbidity between major depressive disorder and physical diseases: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management (2023) · cites this paper as [122]
The Results (Primary Analyses; page not available) found no significant difference in new-onset depression after hospitalization for COVID-19 versus another severe acute respiratory infection. The paper studied recorded depression diagnoses, not specifically MDD, and its one-year follow-up does not establish that the increased risk is transient. The finding is limited to survivors of hospitalization. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Clift, A. K., Ranger, T. A., Patone, M., Coupland, C. A. C., Hatch, R., Thomas, K., Hippisley-Cox, J., & Watkinson, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (GB)
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Corresponding author
- Watkinson, Peter
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2022-07-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 690
- ISSN
- 2168-622X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9096686
- OpenAlex
- W4280549898
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (204826/Z/16/Z, 221514/Z/20/Z, 204826)
- Cancer Research UK (A18085, C5255, C5255/A18085, 204826/Z/16/Z, C2195/A31310)
- University of Oxford (204826/Z/16/Z)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, long COVID, neuropsychiatric sequelae, severe acute respiratory infection, anxiety, depression, dementia, psychosis, bipolar disorder, antidepressants, antipsychotic drugs, hospital discharge, intensive care unit admission, risk factors, primary care follow-up, QResearch database
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Adult, Aftercare, Dementia, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Cohort Studies, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review