The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment and Prognosis for Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Data on outcomes following surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are limited. The incidence of ICC is increasing and it has a poor prognosis. No consensus has been reached regarding the optimal treatment modalities. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and synthesize the available evidence regarding treatment and prognosis in patients with ICC. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles published between January 1, 2000, and April 1, 2013. STUDY SELECTION: Only studies assessing predictors of survival or recurrence in patients undergoing curative-intent surgical treatment of ICC were included. Small series, studies reporting on mixed types of cholangiocarcinoma, or exclusively on hepatolithiasis-associated cholangiocarcinoma, and those published in a language other than English, French, German, Italian, or Greek, were excluded. Fifty-seven of 960 articles were therefore analyzed. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were extracted by 3 independent reviewers. Multiple studies reporting on the same population were excluded. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We hypothesized that preoperative variables and tumor characteristics affect patient survival. The outcomes of the study were overall survival and recurrence-free survival. The hypothesis was formulated before data collection. RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies (4756 patients) were included in the review. Median patient age ranged from 49 to 67 years, and 57% were male. Most patients had a solitary (69%), large (median size, 4.5-8.0 cm) tumor of the mass-forming type (86%). Approximately one-third of the patients had lymph node metastasis (34%) or vascular (38%), perineural (29%), or biliary invasion (29%). Most underwent a major hepatectomy (82%), often accompanied by lymphadenectomy (67%) and sometimes by extrahepatic bile duct resection (23%). Median and 5-year overall survival (OS) generally were approximately 28 months (range, 9-53 months) and 30% (range, 5%-56%), respectively; factors predicting shorter OS included large tumor size, multiple tumors, lymph node metastasis, and vascular invasion. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy did not appear to be beneficial. Seven studies (2132 patients) provided data for the meta-analysis. Factors associated with shorter OS included older age (pooled hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17), larger tumor size (1.09; 1.02-1.16), presence of multiple tumors (1.70; 1.43-2.02), lymph node metastasis (2.09; 1.80-2.43), vascular invasion (1.87; 1.44-2.42), and poor tumor differentiation (1.41; 1.17-1.71). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The prognosis of ICC is dictated mainly by tumor factors. Future research could focus on the usefulness of adjuvant treatment as well as other multidisciplinary treatment modalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Michiels, S., Piedbois, P., Burdett, S., Syz, N., Stewart, L., & Pignon, J.-P. (2005) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462305050154 · Cited by 154
Rosmarakis, E. S., Soteriades, E. S., Vergidis, P. I., Kasiakou, S. K., & Falagas, M. E. (2005) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.04-3140lfe · Cited by 83
Cited by
Liver resection and transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Mazzaferro, V., Gorgen, A., Roayaie, S., Droz dit Busset, M., & Sapisochin, G. (2020) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.11.020 · Cited by 355
Surveillance for hepatobiliary cancers in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis
Ali, A. H., Tabibian, J. H., Nasser‐Ghodsi, N., Lennon, R. J., DeLeon, T., Borad, M. J., Hilscher, M., Silveira, M. G., Carey, E. J., & Lindor, K. D. (2018) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29730 · Cited by 140
Lu, J.-C., Zeng, H.-Y., Sun, Q.-M., Meng, Q.-N., Huang, X.-Y., Zhang, P.-F., Yang, X., Peng, R., Gao, C., Wei, C.-Y., et al. (2019) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.36276 · Cited by 72
Huang, L., Cai, J., Guo, H., Gu, J., Tong, Y., Qiu, B., Wang, C., Li, M., Xia, L., Zhang, J., et al. (2019) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.30404 · Cited by 42
Proteome Landscapes of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Yi, X., Zhu, J., Liu, W., Peng, L., Lu, C., Sun, P., Huang, L., Nie, X., Huang, S., Guo, T., et al. (2023) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100604 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Mavros, M. N., Economopoulos, K. P., Alexiou, V. G., & Pawlik, T. M.
- Venue
- JAMA Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2014-06-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 565
- ISSN
- 2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963570372
- Cited by
- 808
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment and Prognosis for Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5137
- The paper
- Mavros, M. N., Economopoulos, K. P., Alexiou, V. G., & Pawlik, T. M. (2014). Treatment and Prognosis for Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.